Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

x                Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

 

OR

 

o                   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

for the transition period from                    to                  

 

Commission file number: 000-50067

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

16-1616605

(State of organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

 

2501 CEDAR SPRINGS

 

 

DALLAS, TEXAS

 

75201

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(214) 953-9500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer x

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

 

As of October 29, 2012, the Registrant had 66,727,369 common units outstanding.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item

 

Description

 

Page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.

 

Financial Statements

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

4.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

6.

 

Exhibits

 

43

 



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

2,518

 

$

24,143

 

Accounts receivable:

 

 

 

 

 

Trade, net of allowance for bad debt of $428 and $405, respectively

 

75,067

 

22,680

 

Accrued revenue and other

 

121,293

 

143,115

 

Fair value of derivative assets

 

4,336

 

2,867

 

Natural gas and natural gas liquids, prepaid expenses and other

 

15,096

 

9,951

 

Assets held for disposition

 

22,822

 

 

Total current assets

 

241,132

 

202,756

 

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $472,877 and $406,273, respectively

 

1,394,881

 

1,241,901

 

Fair value of derivative assets

 

750

 

 

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $242,205 and $199,248, respectively

 

446,105

 

451,462

 

Goodwill

 

150,630

 

 

Investment in limited liability company

 

88,761

 

35,000

 

Other assets, net

 

27,168

 

24,212

 

Total assets

 

$

2,349,427

 

$

1,955,331

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable, drafts payable and other

 

$

39,906

 

$

22,550

 

Accrued gas and crude oil purchases

 

99,527

 

106,232

 

Fair value of derivative liabilities

 

860

 

5,587

 

Other current liabilities

 

58,504

 

66,065

 

Accrued interest

 

15,326

 

24,918

 

Liabilities held for disposition

 

2,261

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

216,384

 

225,352

 

Long-term debt

 

970,331

 

798,409

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

31,922

 

23,919

 

Deferred tax liability

 

74,516

 

7,192

 

Fair value of derivative liabilities

 

12

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

Partners’ equity

 

1,056,262

 

900,459

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and partners’ equity

 

$

2,349,427

 

$

1,955,331

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per unit amounts)

 

Revenues

 

$

406,968

 

$

517,498

 

$

1,129,871

 

$

1,533,003

 

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased gas, NGLs and crude oil

 

307,223

 

426,539

 

840,070

 

1,255,650

 

Operating expenses

 

35,551

 

28,126

 

93,928

 

81,083

 

General and administrative

 

16,470

 

13,712

 

44,398

 

38,111

 

(Gain) loss on sale of property

 

109

 

397

 

(395

)

317

 

(Gain) loss on derivatives

 

759

 

563

 

(1,977

)

5,520

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

45,059

 

31,912

 

110,107

 

93,200

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

405,171

 

501,249

 

1,086,131

 

1,473,881

 

Operating income

 

1,797

 

16,249

 

43,740

 

59,122

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net of interest income

 

(23,229

)

(19,507

)

(63,932

)

(59,952

)

Equity in earnings of limited liability company

 

1,511

 

 

1,511

 

 

Other income

 

4,439

 

786

 

4,464

 

656

 

Total other expense

 

(17,279

)

(18,721

)

(57,957

)

(59,296

)

Loss before non-controlling interest and income taxes

 

(15,482

)

(2,472

)

(14,217

)

(174

)

Income tax provision

 

(672

)

(287

)

(1,507

)

(898

)

Net loss

 

(16,154

)

(2,759

)

(15,724

)

(1,072

)

Less: Net loss attributable to the non- controlling interest

 

(54

)

(23

)

(163

)

(130

)

Net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.

 

$

(16,100

)

$

(2,736

)

$

(15,561

)

$

(942

)

Preferred interest in net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.

 

$

5,640

 

$

4,558

 

$

15,346

 

$

13,382

 

General partner interest in net loss

 

$

(309

)

$

(76

)

$

(420

)

$

(709

)

Limited partners’ interest in net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.

 

$

(21,431

)

$

(7,218

)

$

(30,487

)

$

(13,615

)

Net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. per limited partners’ unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted per common unit

 

$

(0.34

)

$

(0.14

)

$

(0.53

)

$

(0.26

)

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Net loss

 

$

(16,154

)

$

(2,759

)

$

(15,724

)

$

(1,072

)

Hedging (gains) losses reclassified to earnings

 

(593

)

421

 

(168

)

1,510

 

Adjustment in fair value of derivatives

 

(179

)

335

 

1,578

 

(1,200

)

Comprehensive loss

 

(16,926

)

(2,003

)

(14,314

)

(762

)

Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

54

 

23

 

163

 

130

 

Comprehensive loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.

 

$

(16,872

)

$

(1,980

)

$

(14,151

)

$

(632

)

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ Equity

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General Partner

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Units

 

Preferred Units

 

Interest

 

Comprehensive

 

Non-Controlling

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Units

 

$

 

Units

 

$

 

Units

 

Income (loss)

 

Interest

 

Total

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

$

730,010

 

50,677

 

$

147,770

 

14,706

 

$

20,322

 

1,334

 

$

(503

)

$

2,860

 

$

900,459

 

Issuance of common units

 

232,791

 

15,780

 

 

 

3,362

 

207

 

 

 

236,153

 

Proceeds from exercise of unit options

 

347

 

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

347

 

Conversion of restricted units for common units, net of units withheld for taxes

 

(1,030

)

188

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,030

)

Capital contributions

 

 

 

 

 

98

 

5

 

 

 

98

 

Stock-based compensation

 

3,973

 

 

 

 

3,523

 

 

 

 

7,496

 

Distributions

 

(54,155

)

 

(14,412

)

 

(4,324

)

 

 

(56

)

(72,947

)

Net income (loss)

 

(30,487

)

 

15,346

 

 

(420

)

 

 

(163

)

(15,724

)

Hedging gains or losses reclassified to earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(168

)

 

(168

)

Adjustment in fair value of derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,578

 

 

1,578

 

Balance, September 30, 2012

 

$

881,449

 

66,715

 

$

148,704

 

14,706

 

$

22,561

 

1,546

 

$

907

 

$

2,641

 

$

1,056,262

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September
30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(15,724

)

$

(1,072

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities, net of assets acquired or liabilities assumed:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

110,107

 

93,200

 

(Gain) loss on sale of property and other assets

 

(3,381

)

317

 

Deferred tax benefit

 

(375

)

(375

)

Non-cash stock-based compensation

 

7,496

 

5,504

 

Non-cash portion of derivatives (gain) loss

 

(5,523

)

165

 

Amortization of debt issue costs

 

3,940

 

5,278

 

Amortization of discount on notes

 

1,423

 

1,423

 

Equity in earnings of limited liability company

 

(1,511

)

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable, accrued revenue and other

 

(18,431

)

30,115

 

Natural gas and natural gas liquids, prepaid expenses and other

 

(7,144

)

(3,493

)

Accounts payable, accrued gas and crude oil purchases and other accrued liabilities

 

(26,296

)

(47,181

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

44,581

 

83,881

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property and equipment

 

(141,319

)

(62,829

)

Acquisition of business

 

(212,521

)

 

Proceeds from sale of property

 

11,677

 

425

 

Investment in limited liability company

 

(52,250

)

(35,000

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(394,413

)

(97,404

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from borrowings

 

696,500

 

390,250

 

Payments on borrowings

 

(526,000

)

(322,308

)

Payments on capital lease obligations

 

(2,337

)

(2,254

)

Increase (decrease) in drafts payable

 

4,319

 

(103

)

Debt refinancing costs

 

(6,896

)

(3,936

)

Conversion of restricted units, net of units withheld for taxes

 

(1,030

)

(1,798

)

Issuance of common units

 

232,791

 

 

Distribution to partners

 

(72,947

)

(59,135

)

Proceeds from exercise of unit options

 

347

 

513

 

Contributions from general partner

 

3,460

 

159

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

328,207

 

1,388

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

(21,625

)

(12,135

)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

24,143

 

17,697

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

2,518

 

$

5,562

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

70,460

 

$

70,074

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

$

953

 

$

905

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

September 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

(1) General

 

Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Partnership” mean Crosstex Energy, L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

 

Crosstex Energy, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 12, 2002, is engaged in the gathering, transmission, processing and marketing of natural gas, natural gas liquids, or NGLs, and crude oil. The Partnership connects the wells of natural gas producers in the geographic areas of its gathering systems in order to gather for a fee or purchase the gas production, processes natural gas for the removal of NGLs, transports natural gas and NGLs and ultimately provides natural gas and NGLs to a variety of markets. The Partnership operates processing plants that process gas transported to the plants by major interstate pipelines or from our own gathering systems under a variety of fee arrangements.  In addition, the Partnership purchases natural gas and NGLs from producers not connected to its gathering systems for resale and markets natural gas and NGLs on behalf of producers for a fee.  The Partnership provides a variety of crude services throughout the Ohio River Valley (ORV) which include crude oil gathering via pipelines and trucks and oilfield brine disposal.  The Partnership recently added crude oil terminal facilities in south Louisiana to provide access for crude oil producers to the premium markets in this area.

 

Crosstex Energy GP, LLC (the “General Partner”) is the general partner of the Partnership. Crosstex Energy GP, LLC is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Crosstex Energy, Inc. (“CEI”).

 

(a) Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, are unaudited and do not include all the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods have been made and are of a recurring nature unless otherwise disclosed herein. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for a full year. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial statements for the prior year to conform to the current presentation. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management of the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

(b) Investment in Limited Liability Company

 

On June 22, 2011, the Partnership entered into a limited liability agreement with Howard Energy Partners (“HEP”) for an initial capital contribution of $35.0 million in exchange for an individual ownership interest in HEP. In 2012, the Partnership made an additional capital contribution of $52.3 million to HEP related to HEP’s acquisition of substantially all of Meritage Midstream Services’ natural gas gathering assets in south Texas. HEP owns midstream assets and provides midstream and construction services to Eagle Ford Shale producers.  The Partnership owns 30.6 percent of HEP and accounts for this investment under the equity method of accounting. This investment is reflected on the balance sheet as “Investment in limited liability company.”  The Partnership’s proportional share of earnings is recorded as an increase to this investment account and recorded as equity in earnings of limited liability company.

 

(c) Potential Change in use of Sabine Plant during 2012

 

Currently, the Partnership’s Sabine plant has a contract with a third-party to fractionate the raw-make NGLs produced by the Sabine plant.  The primary term of the contract expired in March 2012 and is currently renewed on a month-to-month basis.  The Partnership anticipates that operations will cease in early 2013 because it is likely that this third-party fractionation agreement will be terminated.  During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Partnership revised the useful life of these assets and began accelerating depreciation and amortization for the estimated non-recoverable costs associated with the plant totaling $26.4 million.  Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 includes $8.8 million associated with such non-recoverable costs, and the Partnership will recognize additional depreciation and amortization expense of $8.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013.  The net book value for the plant, excluding these non-recoverable costs, is $19.0 million as of September 30, 2012.   Although the Partnership does not have specific plans at this time to relocate the Sabine plant if it is idled, the Partnership may utilize it elsewhere in its operations.

 

8



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(2) Acquisition

 

On July 2, 2012, the Partnership, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, completed its previously announced acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Clearfield Energy, Inc. and Clearfield Energy’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “Clearfield”). Clearfield is a well-established crude oil, condensate and water services company with operations in Ohio, Kentucky and West Virginia. Clearfield’s business includes crude oil pipelines, a barge loading terminal on the Ohio River, a rail loading terminal on the Ohio Central Railroad network, a trucking fleet, and brine water disposal wells.  All of these assets are included in the Partnership’s ORV segment.

 

The Partnership paid approximately $212.5 million in cash (before working capital and certain purchase price adjustments) for the acquisition and the purchase was funded with proceeds from the senior notes offering in May 2012.

 

Included in the Clearfield acquisition were three local distributions companies, or LDCs, which the Partnership marketed for sale and were classified as held for disposition on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2012.  The Partnership chose not to apply discontinued operations presentation on the income statement as the related amounts are immaterial.  On October 15, 2012, the Partnership entered into an agreement to sell the LDCs for an amount of $19.5 million.  The assets held for disposition are recorded at the sales price of $19.5 million.

 

The goodwill recognized from the Clearfield acquisition results primarily from the value of opportunity created from the strategic asset positioning in the Utica and Marcellus shale plays which provides the Partnership with a substantial growth platform in a new geographic area.

 

The Partnership recognized intangible assets related to customer relationships.  The acquired intangible assets will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated customer contract life of approximately 20 years.

 

The Partnership assumed a long-term liability related to additional benefit obligations.  Also, the Partnership assumed a long-term liability related to inactive easement commitments for a period of 10 years.

 

The Partnership formed a wholly-owned corporate entity to acquire the common stock of Clearfield and assumed the carryover basis of the Clearfield assets.  The difference between our purchase price for the Clearfield assets and the carryover tax basis for such assets resulted in the recognition of a deferred tax liability of $67.7 million.  This deferred liability is expected to become payable no later than 2027.

 

Purchase Price Allocation in Clearfield Acquisition

 

Based on currently available information, the following table is a summary of the consideration paid for the Clearfield acquisition and the preliminary purchase price allocation for the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

 

Purchase Price Allocation (in thousands):

 

 

 

Purchase Price to Clearfield Energy, Inc.

 

$

212,521

 

Total purchase price

 

$

212,521

 

 

 

 

 

Assets acquired:

 

 

 

Current assets

 

$

15,466

 

Assets held for disposition

 

19,500

 

Property, plant, and equipment

 

93,671

 

Goodwill

 

150,630

 

Intangibles

 

37,600

 

Liabilities assumed:

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

(23,575

)

Liabilities held for disposition

 

(2,642

)

Deferred taxes

 

(67,700

)

Long term liabilities

 

(10,429

)

Total purchase price

 

$

212,521

 

 

For the period from July 2, 2012 to September 30, 2012, the Partnership recognized $52.9 million of crude oil buy/sell, crude oil transportation and brine disposal sales related to properties acquired in the Clearfield acquisition. For the period from July 2, 2012 to September 30, 2012, the Partnership recognized $46.1 million net operating expense related to properties acquired in the Clearfield acquisition.

 

9



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

Pro Forma Information

 

The following unaudited pro forma condensed financial data for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 gives effect to the Clearfield acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2011. The unaudited pro forma condensed financial information has been included for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results that might have occurred had the transactions taken place on the dates indicated and is not intended to be a projection of future results.

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30, 2011

 

September 30, 2012

 

September 30, 2011

 

Pro forma total revenues

 

$

564,198

 

$

1,235,782

 

$

1,676,004

 

Pro forma net loss

 

$

(6,067

)

$

(18,005

)

$

(9,330

)

Pro forma net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.

 

$

(6,043

)

$

(17,842

)

$

(9,200

)

Pro forma net loss per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and Diluted

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.32

)

$

(0.18

)

 

(3) Long-Term Debt

 

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Bank credit facility (due 2016), interest based on Prime and/or LIBOR plus an applicable margin, interest rate at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was 4.75% and 2.9%, respectively

 

$

5,500

 

$

85,000

 

Senior unsecured notes (due 2018), net of discount of $10.2 million and $11.6 million, respectively, which bear interest at the rate of 8.875%

 

714,831

 

713,409

 

Senior unsecured notes (due 2022), which bear interest at the rate of 7.125%

 

250,000

 

 

Debt classified as long-term

 

$

970,331

 

$

798,409

 

 

Credit Facility.  As of September 30, 2012, there was $61.6 million in outstanding letters of credit and $5.5 million borrowed under the Partnership’s bank credit facility, leaving approximately $567.9 million available for future borrowing based on the borrowing capacity of $635.0 million.

 

In January 2012, the Partnership further amended its credit facility to increase the Partnership’s borrowing capacity from $485.0 million to $635.0 million and amend certain terms under the facility to provide additional financial flexibility during the remaining four-year term of the facility.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

The Partnership amended the credit facility again in May 2012.  This amendment, among other things, (i) increased the maximum permitted consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the amended credit facility, being generally computed as the ratio of total funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-cash charges) during the Clearfield acquisition period (as defined in the amended credit facility, being generally the four quarterly measurement periods after closing the Clearfield acquisition) from 5.0 to 1.0 to 5.5 to 1.0, and (ii) increased the maximum permitted consolidated leverage ratio during any other acquisition period (as defined in the amended credit facility, being generally the three quarterly measurement periods after closing certain material acquisitions) from 5.0 to 1.0 to 5.5 to 1.0.

 

In August 2012, the Partnership amended the credit facility to include projected EBITDA from material projects (as defined in the amendment, but generally being the construction or expansion of any capital project by the Partnership or any of its subsidiaries that is expected to cost more than $20.0 million and the Partnership’s “Riverside Phase II” project) in its EBITDA for purposes of calculating compliance with the amended credit agreement’s minimum interest coverage ratio, maximum leverage ratio and maximum senior leverage ratio. The amount of projected EBITDA from material projects that is included in such financial covenant calculations is subject to the approval of Bank of America, N.A. (the “Administrative Agent”), and it will be based on contracts related to the material project, expected expenses, the completion percentage of the material project, the expected commercial operation date of the material project, and other factors deemed appropriate by the Administrative Agent.  The aggregate amount of all material project EBITDA adjustments during any period shall be limited to 15% of the total actual consolidated EBITDA for such period (which total actual consolidated EBITDA shall be determined without including any material project EBITDA adjustments).

 

The credit facility is guaranteed by substantially all of the Partnership’s subsidiaries and is secured by first priority liens on substantially all of the Partnership’s assets and those of the guarantors, including all material pipeline, gas gathering and processing assets, crude gathering and transportation assets, brine disposal assets, all material working capital assets and a pledge of all of the Partnership’s equity interests in substantially all of its subsidiaries and its interest in HEP. The Partnership may prepay all loans under the amended credit facility at any time without premium or penalty (other than customary LIBOR breakage costs), subject to certain notice requirements.

 

All other material terms of the credit facility are described in Part II, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Indebtedness” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Partnership expects to be in compliance with all credit facility covenants for at least the next twelve months.

 

2022 Notes.  On May 24, 2012, the Partnership issued $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.125% senior unsecured notes (the “2022 Notes”) due on June 1, 2022 at an issue price of 100% of the principal amount to yield 7.125% to maturity.  The interest payments are due semi-annually in arrears in June and December.  Net proceeds from the sale of the notes of $245.1 million (net of transaction costs) were used to fund the Clearfield acquisition and for general partnership purposes, including capital expenditures for the Cajun-Sibon natural gas liquids pipeline expansion.

 

The Partnership may redeem up to 35% of the 2022 Notes at any time prior to June 1, 2015 in an amount not greater than the cash proceeds from equity offerings at a redemption price of 107.125% of the principal amount of the 2022 Notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date).

 

Prior to June 1, 2017, the Partnership may redeem all or a part of the 2022 Notes at the redemption price equal to the sum of the principal amount thereof, plus a make-whole premium at the redemption date, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.

 

On or after June 1, 2017, the Partnership may redeem all or a part of the 2022 Notes at redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) equal to 103.563% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2017, 102.375% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2018, 101.188% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2019 and 100.000% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2020 and at any time thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date on the 2022 Notes.

 

Under the terms of the indenture governing the 2022 Notes agreement, repurchase offer obligations would be triggered by a change of control combined with a ratings decline on the notes.

 

Non-Guarantors.  All senior unsecured notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by each of the Partnership’s current material subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”), with the exception of its regulated Louisiana subsidiaries (which may only guarantee up to $500.0 million of the Partnership’s debt), CDC (the Partnership’s joint venture in Denton County, Texas which is not 100% owned by the

 

11



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

Partnership) and Crosstex Energy Finance Corporation (a wholly owned Delaware corporation that was organized for the sole purpose of being a co-issuer of certain of the Partnership’s indebtedness, including the senior unsecured notes). Guarantors may not sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of their properties or assets, or consolidate with or merge into another company if such a sale would cause a default under the terms of the senior unsecured notes. Since certain wholly owned subsidiaries do not guarantee the senior unsecured notes, the condensed consolidating financial statements of the guarantors and non-guarantors for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are disclosed below in accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X. Comprehensive income (loss) is not included in the condensed consolidating statements of operations of the guarantors and non-guarantors for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 as these amounts are not considered material.

 

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

September 30, 2012

 

 

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Elimination

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

$

227,012

 

$

14,120

 

$

 

$

241,132

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

1,189,183

 

205,698

 

 

1,394,881

 

Total other assets

 

713,414

 

 

 

713,414

 

Total assets

 

$

2,129,609

 

$

219,818

 

$

 

$

2,349,427

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

$

209,899

 

$

6,485

 

$

 

$

216,384

 

Long-term debt

 

970,331

 

 

 

970,331

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

106,450

 

 

 

106,450

 

Partners’ capital

 

842,929

 

213,333

 

 

1,056,262

 

Total liabilities & partners’ capital

 

$

2,129,609

 

$

219,818

 

$

 

$

2,349,427

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Elimination

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

$

189,410

 

$

13,346

 

$

 

$

202,756

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

1,026,537

 

215,364

 

 

1,241,901

 

Total other assets

 

510,671

 

3

 

 

510,674

 

Total assets

 

$

1,726,618

 

$

228,713

 

$

 

$

1,955,331

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

$

220,811

 

$

4,541

 

$

 

$

225,352

 

Long-term debt

 

798,409

 

 

 

798,409

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

31,111

 

 

 

31,111

 

Partners’ capital

 

676,287

 

224,172

 

 

900,459

 

Total liabilities & partners’ capital

 

$

1,726,618

 

$

228,713

 

$

 

$

1,955,331

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012

 

 

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Elimination

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Total revenues

 

$

392,085

 

$

20,468

 

$

(5,585

)

$

406,968

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

(400,897

)

(9,859

)

5,585

 

(405,171

)

Operating income (loss)

 

(8,812

)

10,609

 

 

1,797

 

Interest expense, net

 

(23,220

)

(9

)

 

(23,229

)

Other income

 

5,950

 

 

 

5,950

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest and income taxes

 

(26,082

)

10,600

 

 

(15,482

)

Income tax provision

 

(665

)

(7

)

 

(672

)

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

54

 

 

54

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.

 

$

(26,747

)

$

10,647

 

$

 

$

(16,100

)

 

12



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011

 

 

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Elimination

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

501,866

 

$

21,287

 

$

(5,655

)

$

517,498

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

(497,149

)

(9,755

)

5,655

 

(501,249

)

Operating income

 

4,717

 

11,532

 

 

16,249

 

Interest expense, net

 

(19,507

)

 

 

(19,507

)

Other expense

 

786

 

 

 

786

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest and income taxes

 

(14,004

)

11,532

 

 

(2,472

)

Income tax provision

 

(283

)

(4

)

 

(287

)

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

23

 

 

23

 

Net (loss) income attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.

 

$

(14,287

)

$

11,551

 

$

 

$

(2,736

)

 

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

 

 

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Elimination

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

1,086,065

 

$

64,946

 

$

(21,140

)

$

1,129,871

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

(1,078,556

)

(28,715

)

21,140

 

(1,086,131

)

Operating income

 

7,509

 

36,231

 

 

43,740

 

Interest expense, net

 

(63,867

)

(65

)

 

(63,932

)

Other income

 

5,975

 

 

 

5,975

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest and income taxes

 

(50,383

)

36,166

 

 

(14,217

)

Income tax provision

 

(1,493

)

(14

)

 

(1,507

)

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

163

 

 

163

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.

 

$

(51,876

)

$

36,315

 

$

 

$

(15,561

)

 

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

 

 

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Elimination

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

1,487,910

 

$

65,148

 

$

(20,055

)

$

1,533,003

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

(1,464,720

)

(29,216

)

20,055

 

(1,473,881

)

Operating income

 

23,190

 

35,932

 

 

59,122

 

Interest expense, net

 

(59,952

)

 

 

(59,952

)

Other expense

 

656

 

 

 

656

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest and income taxes

 

(36,106

)

35,932

 

 

(174

)

Income tax provision

 

(886

)

(12

)

 

(898

)

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

130

 

 

130

 

Net (loss) income attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.

 

$

(36,992

)

$

36,050

 

$

 

$

(942

)

 

13



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flow

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

 

 

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Elimination

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

(3,335

)

$

47,916

 

$

 

$

44,581

 

Net cash flows used in investing activities

 

$

(393,866

)

$

(547

)

$

 

$

(394,413

)

Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

 

$

328,206

 

$

(46,989

)

$

46,989

 

$

328,206

 

 

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

 

 

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Elimination

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash flows provided by operating activities

 

$

35,676

 

$

48,205

 

$

 

$

83,881

 

Net cash flows used in investing activities

 

$

(95,202

)

$

(2,202

)

$

 

$

(97,404

)

Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

 

$

1,388

 

$

(45,274

)

$

45,274

 

$

1,388

 

 

(4) Other Long-term Liabilities

 

Prior to January 1, 2011, the Partnership entered into 9 and 10-year capital leases for certain equipment. Assets under capital leases as of September 30, 2012 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 

Compressor equipment

 

$

37,199

 

Less: Accumulated amortization

 

(12,950

)

Net assets under capital leases

 

$

24,249

 

 

The following are the minimum lease payments to be made in each of the following years indicated for the capital leases in effect as of September 30, 2012 (in thousands):

 

2012

 

$

1,146

 

2013 through 2016 ($4,582 annually)

 

18,328

 

Thereafter

 

12,100

 

Less: Interest

 

(5,525

)

Net minimum lease payments under capital lease

 

26,049

 

Less: Current portion of net minimum lease payments

 

(4,448

)

Long-term portion of net minimum lease payments

 

$

21,601

 

 

Other long-term liabilities also include an inactive easement commitment of $7.1 million (net of discount of $2.9 million) assumed with the Clearfield acquisition which is due over the next 10 years as such easements are utilized and a long-term liability of  $3.2 million assumed with the Clearfield acquisition for consulting services from the affiliate of the seller which is payable in monthly installments of $0.08 million over the next 5 years with a contract cancellation option by the affiliate of the seller in July 2014 that would cause the remaining liability to be payable at such time.

 

14



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

(5)      Partners’ Capital

 

(a) Issuance of Common Units

 

On May 15, 2012, we issued 10,120,000 common units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership at a public offering price of $16.28 per unit for net proceeds of $158.0 million.  In addition, Crosstex Energy GP, LLC made a general partner contribution of $3.4 million in connection with the issuance to maintain its 2% general partner interest. The net proceeds from the common units offering were used for general partnership purposes.

 

On September 14, 2012, we issued 5,660,378 common units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership at a private offering price of $13.25 per unit for net proceeds of $74.8 million.  The net proceeds from the common units issuance were used primarily to fund the Partnership’s currently identified projects, including the Cajun-Sibon NGL pipeline expansion, and for general partnership purposes.  Crosstex Energy GP, LLC did not make a general partner contribution to maintain its 2% general partner interest as discussed in the “Amendment to Partnership Agreement” section below.

 

(b) Amendment to Partnership Agreement

 

On September 13, 2012, the board of directors of the General Partner amended the Partnership Agreement to (i) convert the General Partner’s obligation to make capital contributions to the Partnership to maintain its 2% interest in connection with the issuance of additional limited partner interests by the Partnership to an option of the General Partner to make future capital contributions to maintain its then current general partner percentage interest and (ii) amend certain terms and conditions of the Series A Convertible Preferred Units (the “Preferred Units”), including, among other corresponding modifications, the following amendments:

 

· Distributions Paid-In-Kind (PIK): for each quarter through the quarter ending December 31, 2013 (the “PIK Period”), the Partnership will pay distributions in-kind on the Preferred Units (“PIK Preferred Units”) without penalty and without affecting the Partnership’s ability to pay cash distributions on the common units.

 

· PIK Preferred Unit Price: during the PIK Period, the fixed price used to determine the number of PIK Preferred Units to be paid instead of cash distributions will increase from $8.50 per Preferred Unit to $13.25 per Preferred Unit.

 

· Optional Redemption: the existing right of the holders of Preferred Units to convert the Preferred Units into common units was modified so that such right may not be exercised until the earlier of (i) the business day following the record date for the distribution for the quarter ending December 31, 2013 and (ii) February 10, 2014.

 

· Mandatory Redemption: the right of the Partnership to convert the Preferred Units into common units on January 19, 2013 was modified so that such right may not be exercised until the business day following the distribution for the quarter ending December 31, 2013 (subject to the satisfaction of the existing conditions applicable to such right).

 

(c) Cash Distributions

 

Unless restricted by the terms of the Partnership’s credit facility and/or the indentures governing our 2022 Notes and our 8 7/8% senior unsecured notes due 2018 (“2018 Notes” and, together with the 2022 Notes, “all senior unsecured notes”), the Partnership must make distributions of 100% of available cash, as defined in the partnership agreement, within 45 days following the end of each quarter.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

The Partnership’s first quarter and second quarter 2012 distributions on its common and preferred units of $0.33 per unit were paid on May 15, 2012 and August 14, 2012, respectively. The Partnership declared its third quarter 2012 distribution on its common and preferred units of $0.33 per unit to be paid on November 14, 2012.

 

(d) Earnings per Unit and Dilution Computations

 

The Partnership had common units and Preferred Units outstanding during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011.

 

The Preferred Units are entitled to a quarterly distribution paid-in-kind equal to the greater of $0.2125 per unit or the amount of the quarterly distribution per unit paid to common unitholders, subject to certain adjustments. Income is allocated to the Preferred Units in an amount equal to the quarterly distribution with respect to the period earned.  The fair value of the PIK Preferred Unit distributions will be based on the market value of common units on the record date of such distributions.

 

As required under FASB ASC 260-10-45-61A, unvested share-based payments that entitle employees to receive non-forfeitable distributions are considered participating securities, as defined in FASB ASC 260-10-20, for earnings per unit calculations.  The following table reflects the computation of basic earnings per limited partner units for the periods presented (in thousands except per unit amounts):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Limited partners’ interest in net loss

 

$

(21,431

)

$

(7,218

)

$

(30,487

)

$

(13,615

)

Distributed earnings allocated to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common units (1)(2)

 

$

20,948

 

$

15,705

 

$

55,752

 

$

46,020

 

Unvested restricted units (1)(2)

 

310

 

298

 

1,008

 

883

 

Total distributed earnings

 

$

21,258

 

$

16,003

 

$

56,760

 

$

46,903

 

Undistributed loss allocated to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common units

 

$

(41,977

)

$

(22,808

)

$

(85,676

)

$

(59,411

)

Unvested restricted units

 

(712

)

(413

)

(1,571

)

(1,107

)

Total undistributed loss

 

$

(42,689

)

$

(23,221

)

$

(87,247

)

$

(60,518

)

Net loss allocated to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common units

 

$

(21,029

)

$

(7,103

)

$

(29,924

)

$

(13,393

)

Unvested restricted units

 

(402

)

(115

)

(563

)

(222

)

Total limited partners’ interest in net loss

 

$

(21,431

)

$

(7,218

)

$

(30,487

)

$

(13,615

)

Basic and diluted net loss per unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted common unit

 

$

(0.34

)

$

(0.14

)

$

(0.53

)

$

(0.26

)

 


(1)         Three months ended September 30, 2012 represents a declared distribution of $0.33 per unit payable on November 14, 2012.  Nine months ended September 30, 2012 represents distributions paid of $0.66 per unit and distributions declared of $0.33 payable November 14, 2012.

(2)         Three months ended September 30, 2011 represents a declared distribution of $0.31 per unit paid on November 11, 2011. Nine months ended September 30, 2011 represents distributions paid of $0.60 per unit and distributions declared of $0.31 paid November 11, 2011.

 

The following are the unit amounts used to compute the basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Basic and diluted weighted average units outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average limited partner common units outstanding

 

62,027

 

50,650

 

56,315

 

50,562

 

 

16



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

All common unit equivalents were antidilutive in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 because the limited partners were allocated net losses in these periods.

 

The general partner is entitled to a distribution in relation to its percentage interest with respect to all distributions made to common unitholders. If the distributions are in excess of $0.2125 per unit, distributions are made 100.0% to the common and preferred unitholders minus the general partner’s percentage interest, subject to the payment of incentive distributions as described below to the extent that certain target levels of cash distributions are achieved.

 

When quarterly distributions are made pro-rata to common and preferred unitholders, net income for the general partner consists of incentive distributions to the extent earned, a deduction for stock-based compensation attributable to CEI’s stock options and restricted shares and the percentage interest of the original Partnership’s net income (loss) adjusted for the CEI stock-based compensation specifically allocated to the general partner. When quarterly distributions are made solely to the preferred unitholders, the net income for the general partner consists of the CEI stock-based compensation deduction and the general partner’s percentage interest of the Partnership’s net income (loss) after the allocation of income to the preferred unitholders with respect to their preferred distribution adjusted for the CEI stock-based compensation specifically allocated to the general partner.

 

Under the quarterly incentive distribution provisions, generally the Partnership’s general partner is entitled to 13.0% of amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.25 per unit, 23.0% of the amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.3125 per unit and 48.0% of amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.375 per unit. The net income (loss) allocated to the general partner is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Income allocation for incentive distributions

 

$

1,157

 

$

600

 

$

3,266

 

$

1,597

 

Stock-based compensation attributable to CEI’s restricted shares

 

(1,166

)

(634

)

(3,443

)

(2,334

)

General partner interest in net income (loss)

 

(300

)

(42

)

(243

)

28

 

General partner share of net loss

 

$

(309

)

$

(76

)

$

(420

)

$

(709

)

 

(6) Employee Incentive Plans

 

(a)         Long-Term Incentive Plans

 

The Partnership accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718, which requires compensation related to all stock-based awards, including stock options, be recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

 

The Partnership and CEI each have similar unit or share-based payment plans for employees, which are described below.  Share-based compensation associated with the CEI share-based compensation plan awarded to officers and employees of the Partnership are recorded by the Partnership since CEI has no operating activities other than its interest in the Partnership. Amounts recognized in the condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to these plans are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Cost of share-based compensation charged to general and administrative expense

 

$

2,193

 

$

1,304

 

$

6,546

 

$

4,569

 

Cost of share-based compensation charged to operating expense

 

310

 

205

 

950

 

935

 

Total amount charged to income

 

$

2,503

 

$

1,509

 

$

7,496

 

$

5,504

 

 

17



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

(b)  Restricted Units

 

The restricted units are valued at their fair value at the date of grant which is equal to the market value of common units on such date. A summary of the restricted unit activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 is provided below:

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

 

Crosstex Energy, L.P. Restricted Units:

 

Number of
Units

 

Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

 

Non-vested, beginning of period

 

949,844

 

$

10.45

 

Granted

 

371,600

 

16.81

 

Vested*

 

(261,768

)

7.87

 

Forfeited

 

(41,617

)

15.02

 

Non-vested, end of period

 

1,018,059

 

$

13.24

 

Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in thousands)

 

$

15,678

 

 

 

 


* Vested units include 63,512 units withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees.

 

 

The Partnership issued restricted units in 2012 to officers and other employees. These restricted units typically vest at the end of three years and are included in the restricted units outstanding and the current share-based compensation cost calculations at September 30, 2012.

 

A summary of the restricted units’ aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of units vested (market value at date of grant) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are provided below (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

Crosstex Energy, L.P. Restricted Units:

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Aggregate intrinsic value of units vested

 

$

448

 

$

329

 

$

4,031

 

$

6,438

 

Fair value of units vested

 

$

452

 

$

389

 

$

2,060

 

$

5,945

 

 

As of September 30, 2012, there was $6.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted units. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.

 

(c)  Unit Options

 

A summary of the unit option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 is provided below:

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Number of

 

Average

 

Crosstex Energy, L.P. Unit Options:

 

Units

 

Exercise Price

 

Outstanding, beginning of period

 

451,574

 

$

6.99

 

Exercised

 

(69,773

)

5.03

 

Forfeited

 

(11,281

)

15.58

 

Outstanding, end of period

 

370,520

 

$

7.11

 

Options exercisable at end of period

 

304,799

 

 

 

Weighted average contractual term (years) end of period:

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding

 

6.4

 

 

 

Options exercisable

 

6.2

 

 

 

Aggregate intrinsic value end of period (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding

 

$

3,513

 

 

 

Options exercisable

 

$

2,896

 

 

 

 

18



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

A summary of the unit options intrinsic value exercised (market value in excess of exercise price at date of exercise) and fair value of units exercised (value per Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model at date of grant) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 are provided below (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

Crosstex Energy, L.P. Unit Options:

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Intrinsic value of unit options exercised

 

$

327

 

$

348

 

$

805

 

$

1,333

 

Fair value of unit options vested

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

277

 

$

562

 

 

As of September 30, 2012, there was $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested unit options. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.3 years.

 

(d)      Crosstex Energy, Inc.’s Restricted Stock

 

CEI’s restricted shares are valued at their fair value at the date of grant which is equal to the market value of the common stock on such date. A summary of the restricted share activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 is provided below:

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30, 2012

 

Crosstex Energy, Inc. Restricted Shares:

 

Number of
Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

 

Non-vested, beginning of period

 

1,221,351

 

$

7.40

 

Granted

 

476,451

 

13.27

 

Vested*

 

(282,494

)

6.07

 

Forfeited

 

(57,162

)

11.01

 

Non-vested, end of period

 

1,358,146

 

$

9.59

 

Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in thousands)

 

$

19,055

 

 

 

 


* Vested shares include 62,546 shares withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees.

 

CEI issued restricted shares in 2012 to officers and other employees. These restricted shares typically vest at the end of three years and are included in restricted shares outstanding and the current share-based compensation cost calculations at September 30, 2012.

 

A summary of the restricted shares’ aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of shares vested (market value at date of grant) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 are provided below (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

Crosstex Energy, Inc. Restricted Shares:

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Aggregate intrinsic value of shares vested

 

$

537

 

$

226

 

$

3,963

 

$

3,915

 

Fair value of shares vested

 

$

448

 

$

342

 

$

1,714

 

$

5,623

 

 

As of September 30, 2012 there was $6.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to CEI restricted shares for directors, officers and employees. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.

 

 

(e)       Crosstex Energy, Inc.’s Stock Options

 

CEI stock options have not been granted to officers or employees of the Partnership since 2005. There are 37,500 CEI stock options vested and exercisable at September 30, 2012.

 

19



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

(7) Derivatives

 

Commodity Swaps

 

The Partnership manages its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices by hedging the impact of market fluctuations. Swaps are used to manage and hedge price and location risks related to these market exposures. Swaps are also used to manage margins on offsetting fixed-price purchase or sale commitments for physical quantities of natural gas and NGLs.

 

The Partnership commonly enters into various derivative financial transactions which it does not designate as accounting hedges. These transactions include “swing swaps,” “third party on-system financial swaps,” “storage swaps,” “basis swaps,” “processing margin swaps,” “liquids swaps” and “put options.”  Swing swaps are generally short-term in nature (one month) and are usually entered into to protect against changes in the volume of daily versus first-of-month index priced gas supplies or markets. Third party on-system financial swaps are hedges that the Partnership enters into on behalf of its customers who are connected to its systems, wherein the Partnership fixes a supply or market price for a period of time for its customers, and simultaneously enters into the derivative transaction. Storage swap transactions protect against changes in the value of products that the Partnership has stored to serve various operational requirements (gas) or has in inventory due to short term constraints in moving the product to market (liquids). Basis swaps are used to hedge basis location price risk due to buying gas into one of the Partnership’s systems on one index and selling gas off that same system on a different index. Processing margin financial swaps are used to hedge fractionation spread risk at the Partnership’s processing plants relating to the option to process versus bypassing the Partnership’s equity gas.  Liquids financial swaps are used to hedge price risk on percent of liquids (POL) contracts. Put options are purchased to hedge against declines in pricing and as such represent options, not obligations, to sell the related underlying volumes at a fixed price.

 

The components of (gain) loss on derivatives in the condensed consolidated statements of operations relating to commodity swaps are provided below (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Change in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting

 

$

433

 

$

(619

)

$

(5,481

)

$

111

 

Realized losses on derivatives

 

308

 

1,227

 

3,547

 

5,355

 

Ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting

 

18

 

(45

)

(43

)

(127

)

Net (gains) losses related to commodity swaps

 

$

759

 

$

563

 

$

(1,977

)

$

5,339

 

Put option premium mark to market

 

 

 

 

181

 

(Gains) losses on derivatives

 

$

759

 

$

563

 

$

(1,977

)

$

5,520

 

 

The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities relating to commodity swaps are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of derivative assets — current, designated

 

$

888

 

$

151

 

Fair value of derivative assets — current, non-designated

 

3,448

 

2,716

 

Fair value of derivative assets — long term, designated

 

54

 

 

Fair value of derivative assets — long term, non-designated

 

696

 

 

Fair value of derivative liabilities — current, designated

 

(29

)

(702

)

Fair value of derivative liabilities — current, non-designated

 

(831

)

(4,885

)

Fair value of derivative liabilities — long term, designated

 

(11

)

 

Fair value of derivative liabilities — long term, non-designated

 

(1

)

 

Net fair value of derivatives

 

$

4,214

 

$

(2,720

)

 

Set forth below is the summarized notional volumes and fair value of all instruments held for price risk management purposes and related physical offsets as of September 30, 2012 (all gas volumes are expressed in MMBtus and liquids volumes are expressed in gallons). The remaining term of the contracts extend no later than December 2013 for derivatives. Changes in the fair value of the

 

20



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

Partnership’s mark to market derivatives are recorded in earnings in the period the transaction is entered into. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until the related anticipated future cash flow is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion is recorded in earnings immediately.

 

 

 

September 30, 2012

 

Transaction Type

 

Volume

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Cash Flow Hedges:*

 

 

 

 

 

Liquids swaps (short contracts)

 

(8,000

)

$

902

 

Total swaps designated as cash flow hedges

 

 

 

$

902

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark to Market Derivatives:*

 

 

 

 

 

Swing swaps (long contracts)

 

186

 

$

(1

)

Physical offsets to swing swap transactions (short contracts)

 

(186

)

 

Swing swaps (short contracts)

 

(620

)

(3

)

Physical offsets to swing swap transactions (long contracts)

 

620

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basis swaps (long contracts)

 

775

 

(28

)

Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (short contracts)

 

(775

)

2,071

 

Basis swaps (short contracts)

 

(775

)

23

 

Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (long contracts)

 

775

 

(2,233

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Processing margin hedges — liquids (short contracts)

 

(8,791

)

2,453

 

Processing margin hedges — gas (long contracts)

 

1,167

 

(285

)

Processing margin hedges — gas (short contracts)

 

(161

)

147

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liquids swaps - non-designated (short contracts)

 

(4,393

)

1,126

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage swap transactions — gas (short contracts)

 

(300

)

(77

)

Storage swap transactions — liquids inventory (long contracts)

 

630

 

17

 

Storage swap transactions — liquids inventory (short contracts)

 

(1,470

)

102

 

Total mark to market derivatives

 

 

 

$

3,312

 

 


*                 All are gas contracts, volume in MMBtus, except for liquids swaps (designated or non-designated) and processing margin hedges - liquids (volume in gallons).

 

On all transactions where the Partnership is exposed to counterparty risk, the Partnership analyzes the counterparty’s financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, establishes limits and monitors the appropriateness of these limits on an ongoing basis. The Partnership primarily deals with two types of counterparties, financial institutions and other energy companies, when entering into financial derivatives on commodities. The Partnership has entered into Master International Swaps and Derivatives Association Agreements (ISDAs) with its counterparties. If the Partnership’s counterparties failed to perform under existing swap contracts entered into under these ISDAs, the Partnership’s maximum loss as of September 30, 2012 of $5.7 million would be reduced to $5.1 million due to the offsetting of gross fair value payables against gross fair value receivables as allowed by the ISDAs.

 

Impact of Cash Flow Hedges

 

The impact of realized gains or losses from derivatives designated as cash flow hedge contracts in the condensed consolidated statements of operations is summarized below (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

Increase (Decrease) in Midstream Revenue

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Liquids realized gain (loss) included in Midstream revenue

 

$

456

 

$

(527

)

$

851

 

$

(2,235

)

 

21



Table of Contents

 

CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)

 

Natural Gas

 

As of September 30, 2012, the Partnership had no balances in accumulated other comprehensive income related to natural gas.

 

Liquids

 

As of September 30, 2012, an unrealized derivative fair value net gain of $0.9 million related to cash flow hedges of liquids price risk was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. Of that amount, a net gain of $0.8 million is expected to be reclassified into earnings through September 2013. The actual reclassification to earnings will be based on mark to market prices at the contract settlement date, along with the realization of the gain or loss on the related physical volume, which is not reflected in the above table.

 

Derivatives Other Than Cash Flow Hedges

 

Assets and liabilities related to third party derivative contracts, swing swaps, basis swaps, storage swaps, processing margin swaps and liquids swaps are included in the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities and the profit and loss on the mark to market value of these contracts are recorded net as (gain) loss on derivatives in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. The Partnership estimates the fair value of all of its energy trading contracts using actively quoted prices. The estimated fair value of energy trading contracts by maturity date was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Maturity Periods

 

 

 

Less than one year

 

One to two years

 

More than two years

 

Total fair value

 

September 30, 2012.

 

$

2,617

 

$

695

 

$

 

$

3,312

 

 

(8)      Fair Value Measurements

 

FASB ASC 820 sets forth a framework for measuring fair value and required disclosures about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. Fair value under FASB ASC 820 is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, use of unobservable prices or inputs are used to estimate the current fair value, often using an internal valuation model. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the item being valued.

 

FASB ASC 820 established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

 

The Partnership’s derivative contracts primarily consist of commodity swap contracts which are not traded on a public exchange. The fair values of commodity swap contracts are determined using discounted cash flow techniques. The techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs for future commodity prices that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. These market inputs are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instrument’s term, notional amount, discount rate and credit risk and are classified as Level 2 in hierarchy.

 

Net assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):