UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
OR
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-50067
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
16-1616605 |
(State of organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2501 CEDAR SPRINGS |
|
|
DALLAS, TEXAS |
|
75201 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(214) 953-9500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x
As of October 29, 2012, the Registrant had 66,727,369 common units outstanding.
Item |
|
Description |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
26 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,518 |
|
$ |
24,143 |
|
Accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Trade, net of allowance for bad debt of $428 and $405, respectively |
|
75,067 |
|
22,680 |
| ||
Accrued revenue and other |
|
121,293 |
|
143,115 |
| ||
Fair value of derivative assets |
|
4,336 |
|
2,867 |
| ||
Natural gas and natural gas liquids, prepaid expenses and other |
|
15,096 |
|
9,951 |
| ||
Assets held for disposition |
|
22,822 |
|
|
| ||
Total current assets |
|
241,132 |
|
202,756 |
| ||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $472,877 and $406,273, respectively |
|
1,394,881 |
|
1,241,901 |
| ||
Fair value of derivative assets |
|
750 |
|
|
| ||
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $242,205 and $199,248, respectively |
|
446,105 |
|
451,462 |
| ||
Goodwill |
|
150,630 |
|
|
| ||
Investment in limited liability company |
|
88,761 |
|
35,000 |
| ||
Other assets, net |
|
27,168 |
|
24,212 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,349,427 |
|
$ |
1,955,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable, drafts payable and other |
|
$ |
39,906 |
|
$ |
22,550 |
|
Accrued gas and crude oil purchases |
|
99,527 |
|
106,232 |
| ||
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
860 |
|
5,587 |
| ||
Other current liabilities |
|
58,504 |
|
66,065 |
| ||
Accrued interest |
|
15,326 |
|
24,918 |
| ||
Liabilities held for disposition |
|
2,261 |
|
|
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
216,384 |
|
225,352 |
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
970,331 |
|
798,409 |
| ||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
31,922 |
|
23,919 |
| ||
Deferred tax liability |
|
74,516 |
|
7,192 |
| ||
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
12 |
|
|
| ||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Partners equity |
|
1,056,262 |
|
900,459 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and partners equity |
|
$ |
2,349,427 |
|
$ |
1,955,331 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit amounts) |
| ||||||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
406,968 |
|
$ |
517,498 |
|
$ |
1,129,871 |
|
$ |
1,533,003 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Purchased gas, NGLs and crude oil |
|
307,223 |
|
426,539 |
|
840,070 |
|
1,255,650 |
| ||||
Operating expenses |
|
35,551 |
|
28,126 |
|
93,928 |
|
81,083 |
| ||||
General and administrative |
|
16,470 |
|
13,712 |
|
44,398 |
|
38,111 |
| ||||
(Gain) loss on sale of property |
|
109 |
|
397 |
|
(395 |
) |
317 |
| ||||
(Gain) loss on derivatives |
|
759 |
|
563 |
|
(1,977 |
) |
5,520 |
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
45,059 |
|
31,912 |
|
110,107 |
|
93,200 |
| ||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
405,171 |
|
501,249 |
|
1,086,131 |
|
1,473,881 |
| ||||
Operating income |
|
1,797 |
|
16,249 |
|
43,740 |
|
59,122 |
| ||||
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
(23,229 |
) |
(19,507 |
) |
(63,932 |
) |
(59,952 |
) | ||||
Equity in earnings of limited liability company |
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
| ||||
Other income |
|
4,439 |
|
786 |
|
4,464 |
|
656 |
| ||||
Total other expense |
|
(17,279 |
) |
(18,721 |
) |
(57,957 |
) |
(59,296 |
) | ||||
Loss before non-controlling interest and income taxes |
|
(15,482 |
) |
(2,472 |
) |
(14,217 |
) |
(174 |
) | ||||
Income tax provision |
|
(672 |
) |
(287 |
) |
(1,507 |
) |
(898 |
) | ||||
Net loss |
|
(16,154 |
) |
(2,759 |
) |
(15,724 |
) |
(1,072 |
) | ||||
Less: Net loss attributable to the non- controlling interest |
|
(54 |
) |
(23 |
) |
(163 |
) |
(130 |
) | ||||
Net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(16,100 |
) |
$ |
(2,736 |
) |
$ |
(15,561 |
) |
$ |
(942 |
) |
Preferred interest in net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
5,640 |
|
$ |
4,558 |
|
$ |
15,346 |
|
$ |
13,382 |
|
General partner interest in net loss |
|
$ |
(309 |
) |
$ |
(76 |
) |
$ |
(420 |
) |
$ |
(709 |
) |
Limited partners interest in net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(21,431 |
) |
$ |
(7,218 |
) |
$ |
(30,487 |
) |
$ |
(13,615 |
) |
Net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. per limited partners unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic and diluted per common unit |
|
$ |
(0.34 |
) |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(16,154 |
) |
$ |
(2,759 |
) |
$ |
(15,724 |
) |
$ |
(1,072 |
) |
Hedging (gains) losses reclassified to earnings |
|
(593 |
) |
421 |
|
(168 |
) |
1,510 |
| ||||
Adjustment in fair value of derivatives |
|
(179 |
) |
335 |
|
1,578 |
|
(1,200 |
) | ||||
Comprehensive loss |
|
(16,926 |
) |
(2,003 |
) |
(14,314 |
) |
(762 |
) | ||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
54 |
|
23 |
|
163 |
|
130 |
| ||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(16,872 |
) |
$ |
(1,980 |
) |
$ |
(14,151 |
) |
$ |
(632 |
) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners Equity
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
Common Units |
|
Preferred Units |
|
Interest |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Non-Controlling |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
$ |
|
Units |
|
$ |
|
Units |
|
$ |
|
Units |
|
Income (loss) |
|
Interest |
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
730,010 |
|
50,677 |
|
$ |
147,770 |
|
14,706 |
|
$ |
20,322 |
|
1,334 |
|
$ |
(503 |
) |
$ |
2,860 |
|
$ |
900,459 |
|
Issuance of common units |
|
232,791 |
|
15,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,362 |
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
236,153 |
| ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of unit options |
|
347 |
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347 |
| ||||||
Conversion of restricted units for common units, net of units withheld for taxes |
|
(1,030 |
) |
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,030 |
) | ||||||
Capital contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
| ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
3,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,496 |
| ||||||
Distributions |
|
(54,155 |
) |
|
|
(14,412 |
) |
|
|
(4,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
(72,947 |
) | ||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
(30,487 |
) |
|
|
15,346 |
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
(15,724 |
) | ||||||
Hedging gains or losses reclassified to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) | ||||||
Adjustment in fair value of derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
| ||||||
Balance, September 30, 2012 |
|
$ |
881,449 |
|
66,715 |
|
$ |
148,704 |
|
14,706 |
|
$ |
22,561 |
|
1,546 |
|
$ |
907 |
|
$ |
2,641 |
|
$ |
1,056,262 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Nine Months Ended September |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(15,724 |
) |
$ |
(1,072 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities, net of assets acquired or liabilities assumed: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
110,107 |
|
93,200 |
| ||
(Gain) loss on sale of property and other assets |
|
(3,381 |
) |
317 |
| ||
Deferred tax benefit |
|
(375 |
) |
(375 |
) | ||
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
7,496 |
|
5,504 |
| ||
Non-cash portion of derivatives (gain) loss |
|
(5,523 |
) |
165 |
| ||
Amortization of debt issue costs |
|
3,940 |
|
5,278 |
| ||
Amortization of discount on notes |
|
1,423 |
|
1,423 |
| ||
Equity in earnings of limited liability company |
|
(1,511 |
) |
|
| ||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable, accrued revenue and other |
|
(18,431 |
) |
30,115 |
| ||
Natural gas and natural gas liquids, prepaid expenses and other |
|
(7,144 |
) |
(3,493 |
) | ||
Accounts payable, accrued gas and crude oil purchases and other accrued liabilities |
|
(26,296 |
) |
(47,181 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
44,581 |
|
83,881 |
| ||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Additions to property and equipment |
|
(141,319 |
) |
(62,829 |
) | ||
Acquisition of business |
|
(212,521 |
) |
|
| ||
Proceeds from sale of property |
|
11,677 |
|
425 |
| ||
Investment in limited liability company |
|
(52,250 |
) |
(35,000 |
) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(394,413 |
) |
(97,404 |
) | ||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
696,500 |
|
390,250 |
| ||
Payments on borrowings |
|
(526,000 |
) |
(322,308 |
) | ||
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
(2,337 |
) |
(2,254 |
) | ||
Increase (decrease) in drafts payable |
|
4,319 |
|
(103 |
) | ||
Debt refinancing costs |
|
(6,896 |
) |
(3,936 |
) | ||
Conversion of restricted units, net of units withheld for taxes |
|
(1,030 |
) |
(1,798 |
) | ||
Issuance of common units |
|
232,791 |
|
|
| ||
Distribution to partners |
|
(72,947 |
) |
(59,135 |
) | ||
Proceeds from exercise of unit options |
|
347 |
|
513 |
| ||
Contributions from general partner |
|
3,460 |
|
159 |
| ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
328,207 |
|
1,388 |
| ||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(21,625 |
) |
(12,135 |
) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
24,143 |
|
17,697 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
2,518 |
|
$ |
5,562 |
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
70,460 |
|
$ |
70,074 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
953 |
|
$ |
905 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
(1) General
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to we, us, our or the Partnership mean Crosstex Energy, L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Crosstex Energy, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 12, 2002, is engaged in the gathering, transmission, processing and marketing of natural gas, natural gas liquids, or NGLs, and crude oil. The Partnership connects the wells of natural gas producers in the geographic areas of its gathering systems in order to gather for a fee or purchase the gas production, processes natural gas for the removal of NGLs, transports natural gas and NGLs and ultimately provides natural gas and NGLs to a variety of markets. The Partnership operates processing plants that process gas transported to the plants by major interstate pipelines or from our own gathering systems under a variety of fee arrangements. In addition, the Partnership purchases natural gas and NGLs from producers not connected to its gathering systems for resale and markets natural gas and NGLs on behalf of producers for a fee. The Partnership provides a variety of crude services throughout the Ohio River Valley (ORV) which include crude oil gathering via pipelines and trucks and oilfield brine disposal. The Partnership recently added crude oil terminal facilities in south Louisiana to provide access for crude oil producers to the premium markets in this area.
Crosstex Energy GP, LLC (the General Partner) is the general partner of the Partnership. Crosstex Energy GP, LLC is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Crosstex Energy, Inc. (CEI).
(a) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, are unaudited and do not include all the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods have been made and are of a recurring nature unless otherwise disclosed herein. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for a full year. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial statements for the prior year to conform to the current presentation. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Partnerships annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management of the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
(b) Investment in Limited Liability Company
On June 22, 2011, the Partnership entered into a limited liability agreement with Howard Energy Partners (HEP) for an initial capital contribution of $35.0 million in exchange for an individual ownership interest in HEP. In 2012, the Partnership made an additional capital contribution of $52.3 million to HEP related to HEPs acquisition of substantially all of Meritage Midstream Services natural gas gathering assets in south Texas. HEP owns midstream assets and provides midstream and construction services to Eagle Ford Shale producers. The Partnership owns 30.6 percent of HEP and accounts for this investment under the equity method of accounting. This investment is reflected on the balance sheet as Investment in limited liability company. The Partnerships proportional share of earnings is recorded as an increase to this investment account and recorded as equity in earnings of limited liability company.
(c) Potential Change in use of Sabine Plant during 2012
Currently, the Partnerships Sabine plant has a contract with a third-party to fractionate the raw-make NGLs produced by the Sabine plant. The primary term of the contract expired in March 2012 and is currently renewed on a month-to-month basis. The Partnership anticipates that operations will cease in early 2013 because it is likely that this third-party fractionation agreement will be terminated. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Partnership revised the useful life of these assets and began accelerating depreciation and amortization for the estimated non-recoverable costs associated with the plant totaling $26.4 million. Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 includes $8.8 million associated with such non-recoverable costs, and the Partnership will recognize additional depreciation and amortization expense of $8.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013. The net book value for the plant, excluding these non-recoverable costs, is $19.0 million as of September 30, 2012. Although the Partnership does not have specific plans at this time to relocate the Sabine plant if it is idled, the Partnership may utilize it elsewhere in its operations.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Acquisition
On July 2, 2012, the Partnership, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, completed its previously announced acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Clearfield Energy, Inc. and Clearfield Energys wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, Clearfield). Clearfield is a well-established crude oil, condensate and water services company with operations in Ohio, Kentucky and West Virginia. Clearfields business includes crude oil pipelines, a barge loading terminal on the Ohio River, a rail loading terminal on the Ohio Central Railroad network, a trucking fleet, and brine water disposal wells. All of these assets are included in the Partnerships ORV segment.
The Partnership paid approximately $212.5 million in cash (before working capital and certain purchase price adjustments) for the acquisition and the purchase was funded with proceeds from the senior notes offering in May 2012.
Included in the Clearfield acquisition were three local distributions companies, or LDCs, which the Partnership marketed for sale and were classified as held for disposition on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2012. The Partnership chose not to apply discontinued operations presentation on the income statement as the related amounts are immaterial. On October 15, 2012, the Partnership entered into an agreement to sell the LDCs for an amount of $19.5 million. The assets held for disposition are recorded at the sales price of $19.5 million.
The goodwill recognized from the Clearfield acquisition results primarily from the value of opportunity created from the strategic asset positioning in the Utica and Marcellus shale plays which provides the Partnership with a substantial growth platform in a new geographic area.
The Partnership recognized intangible assets related to customer relationships. The acquired intangible assets will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated customer contract life of approximately 20 years.
The Partnership assumed a long-term liability related to additional benefit obligations. Also, the Partnership assumed a long-term liability related to inactive easement commitments for a period of 10 years.
The Partnership formed a wholly-owned corporate entity to acquire the common stock of Clearfield and assumed the carryover basis of the Clearfield assets. The difference between our purchase price for the Clearfield assets and the carryover tax basis for such assets resulted in the recognition of a deferred tax liability of $67.7 million. This deferred liability is expected to become payable no later than 2027.
Purchase Price Allocation in Clearfield Acquisition
Based on currently available information, the following table is a summary of the consideration paid for the Clearfield acquisition and the preliminary purchase price allocation for the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:
Purchase Price Allocation (in thousands): |
|
|
| |
Purchase Price to Clearfield Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
212,521 |
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
212,521 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Assets acquired: |
|
|
| |
Current assets |
|
$ |
15,466 |
|
Assets held for disposition |
|
19,500 |
| |
Property, plant, and equipment |
|
93,671 |
| |
Goodwill |
|
150,630 |
| |
Intangibles |
|
37,600 |
| |
Liabilities assumed: |
|
|
| |
Current liabilities |
|
(23,575 |
) | |
Liabilities held for disposition |
|
(2,642 |
) | |
Deferred taxes |
|
(67,700 |
) | |
Long term liabilities |
|
(10,429 |
) | |
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
212,521 |
|
For the period from July 2, 2012 to September 30, 2012, the Partnership recognized $52.9 million of crude oil buy/sell, crude oil transportation and brine disposal sales related to properties acquired in the Clearfield acquisition. For the period from July 2, 2012 to September 30, 2012, the Partnership recognized $46.1 million net operating expense related to properties acquired in the Clearfield acquisition.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma condensed financial data for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 gives effect to the Clearfield acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2011. The unaudited pro forma condensed financial information has been included for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results that might have occurred had the transactions taken place on the dates indicated and is not intended to be a projection of future results.
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| |||||
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
September 30, 2012 |
|
September 30, 2011 |
| |||
Pro forma total revenues |
|
$ |
564,198 |
|
$ |
1,235,782 |
|
$ |
1,676,004 |
|
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(6,067 |
) |
$ |
(18,005 |
) |
$ |
(9,330 |
) |
Pro forma net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(6,043 |
) |
$ |
(17,842 |
) |
$ |
(9,200 |
) |
Pro forma net loss per common unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
(3) Long-Term Debt
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
Bank credit facility (due 2016), interest based on Prime and/or LIBOR plus an applicable margin, interest rate at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was 4.75% and 2.9%, respectively |
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
Senior unsecured notes (due 2018), net of discount of $10.2 million and $11.6 million, respectively, which bear interest at the rate of 8.875% |
|
714,831 |
|
713,409 |
| ||
Senior unsecured notes (due 2022), which bear interest at the rate of 7.125% |
|
250,000 |
|
|
| ||
Debt classified as long-term |
|
$ |
970,331 |
|
$ |
798,409 |
|
Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2012, there was $61.6 million in outstanding letters of credit and $5.5 million borrowed under the Partnerships bank credit facility, leaving approximately $567.9 million available for future borrowing based on the borrowing capacity of $635.0 million.
In January 2012, the Partnership further amended its credit facility to increase the Partnerships borrowing capacity from $485.0 million to $635.0 million and amend certain terms under the facility to provide additional financial flexibility during the remaining four-year term of the facility.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
The Partnership amended the credit facility again in May 2012. This amendment, among other things, (i) increased the maximum permitted consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the amended credit facility, being generally computed as the ratio of total funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-cash charges) during the Clearfield acquisition period (as defined in the amended credit facility, being generally the four quarterly measurement periods after closing the Clearfield acquisition) from 5.0 to 1.0 to 5.5 to 1.0, and (ii) increased the maximum permitted consolidated leverage ratio during any other acquisition period (as defined in the amended credit facility, being generally the three quarterly measurement periods after closing certain material acquisitions) from 5.0 to 1.0 to 5.5 to 1.0.
In August 2012, the Partnership amended the credit facility to include projected EBITDA from material projects (as defined in the amendment, but generally being the construction or expansion of any capital project by the Partnership or any of its subsidiaries that is expected to cost more than $20.0 million and the Partnerships Riverside Phase II project) in its EBITDA for purposes of calculating compliance with the amended credit agreements minimum interest coverage ratio, maximum leverage ratio and maximum senior leverage ratio. The amount of projected EBITDA from material projects that is included in such financial covenant calculations is subject to the approval of Bank of America, N.A. (the Administrative Agent), and it will be based on contracts related to the material project, expected expenses, the completion percentage of the material project, the expected commercial operation date of the material project, and other factors deemed appropriate by the Administrative Agent. The aggregate amount of all material project EBITDA adjustments during any period shall be limited to 15% of the total actual consolidated EBITDA for such period (which total actual consolidated EBITDA shall be determined without including any material project EBITDA adjustments).
The credit facility is guaranteed by substantially all of the Partnerships subsidiaries and is secured by first priority liens on substantially all of the Partnerships assets and those of the guarantors, including all material pipeline, gas gathering and processing assets, crude gathering and transportation assets, brine disposal assets, all material working capital assets and a pledge of all of the Partnerships equity interests in substantially all of its subsidiaries and its interest in HEP. The Partnership may prepay all loans under the amended credit facility at any time without premium or penalty (other than customary LIBOR breakage costs), subject to certain notice requirements.
All other material terms of the credit facility are described in Part II, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Indebtedness in the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Partnership expects to be in compliance with all credit facility covenants for at least the next twelve months.
2022 Notes. On May 24, 2012, the Partnership issued $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.125% senior unsecured notes (the 2022 Notes) due on June 1, 2022 at an issue price of 100% of the principal amount to yield 7.125% to maturity. The interest payments are due semi-annually in arrears in June and December. Net proceeds from the sale of the notes of $245.1 million (net of transaction costs) were used to fund the Clearfield acquisition and for general partnership purposes, including capital expenditures for the Cajun-Sibon natural gas liquids pipeline expansion.
The Partnership may redeem up to 35% of the 2022 Notes at any time prior to June 1, 2015 in an amount not greater than the cash proceeds from equity offerings at a redemption price of 107.125% of the principal amount of the 2022 Notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date).
Prior to June 1, 2017, the Partnership may redeem all or a part of the 2022 Notes at the redemption price equal to the sum of the principal amount thereof, plus a make-whole premium at the redemption date, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
On or after June 1, 2017, the Partnership may redeem all or a part of the 2022 Notes at redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) equal to 103.563% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2017, 102.375% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2018, 101.188% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2019 and 100.000% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2020 and at any time thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date on the 2022 Notes.
Under the terms of the indenture governing the 2022 Notes agreement, repurchase offer obligations would be triggered by a change of control combined with a ratings decline on the notes.
Non-Guarantors. All senior unsecured notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by each of the Partnerships current material subsidiaries (the Guarantors), with the exception of its regulated Louisiana subsidiaries (which may only guarantee up to $500.0 million of the Partnerships debt), CDC (the Partnerships joint venture in Denton County, Texas which is not 100% owned by the
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Partnership) and Crosstex Energy Finance Corporation (a wholly owned Delaware corporation that was organized for the sole purpose of being a co-issuer of certain of the Partnerships indebtedness, including the senior unsecured notes). Guarantors may not sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of their properties or assets, or consolidate with or merge into another company if such a sale would cause a default under the terms of the senior unsecured notes. Since certain wholly owned subsidiaries do not guarantee the senior unsecured notes, the condensed consolidating financial statements of the guarantors and non-guarantors for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are disclosed below in accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X. Comprehensive income (loss) is not included in the condensed consolidating statements of operations of the guarantors and non-guarantors for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 as these amounts are not considered material.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
September 30, 2012
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total current assets |
|
$ |
227,012 |
|
$ |
14,120 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
241,132 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1,189,183 |
|
205,698 |
|
|
|
1,394,881 |
| ||||
Total other assets |
|
713,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
713,414 |
| ||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,129,609 |
|
$ |
219,818 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,349,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
209,899 |
|
$ |
6,485 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
216,384 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
970,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
970,331 |
| ||||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
106,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
106,450 |
| ||||
Partners capital |
|
842,929 |
|
213,333 |
|
|
|
1,056,262 |
| ||||
Total liabilities & partners capital |
|
$ |
2,129,609 |
|
$ |
219,818 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,349,427 |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total current assets |
|
$ |
189,410 |
|
$ |
13,346 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
202,756 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1,026,537 |
|
215,364 |
|
|
|
1,241,901 |
| ||||
Total other assets |
|
510,671 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
510,674 |
| ||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,726,618 |
|
$ |
228,713 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,955,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
220,811 |
|
$ |
4,541 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
225,352 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
798,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
798,409 |
| ||||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
31,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
31,111 |
| ||||
Partners capital |
|
676,287 |
|
224,172 |
|
|
|
900,459 |
| ||||
Total liabilities & partners capital |
|
$ |
1,726,618 |
|
$ |
228,713 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,955,331 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
392,085 |
|
$ |
20,468 |
|
$ |
(5,585 |
) |
$ |
406,968 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
(400,897 |
) |
(9,859 |
) |
5,585 |
|
(405,171 |
) | ||||
Operating income (loss) |
|
(8,812 |
) |
10,609 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(23,220 |
) |
(9 |
) |
|
|
(23,229 |
) | ||||
Other income |
|
5,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,950 |
| ||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest and income taxes |
|
(26,082 |
) |
10,600 |
|
|
|
(15,482 |
) | ||||
Income tax provision |
|
(665 |
) |
(7 |
) |
|
|
(672 |
) | ||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
54 |
| ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(26,747 |
) |
$ |
10,647 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(16,100 |
) |
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
501,866 |
|
$ |
21,287 |
|
$ |
(5,655 |
) |
$ |
517,498 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
(497,149 |
) |
(9,755 |
) |
5,655 |
|
(501,249 |
) | ||||
Operating income |
|
4,717 |
|
11,532 |
|
|
|
16,249 |
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(19,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(19,507 |
) | ||||
Other expense |
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
|
786 |
| ||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest and income taxes |
|
(14,004 |
) |
11,532 |
|
|
|
(2,472 |
) | ||||
Income tax provision |
|
(283 |
) |
(4 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) | ||||
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
| ||||
Net (loss) income attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(14,287 |
) |
$ |
11,551 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(2,736 |
) |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
1,086,065 |
|
$ |
64,946 |
|
$ |
(21,140 |
) |
$ |
1,129,871 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
(1,078,556 |
) |
(28,715 |
) |
21,140 |
|
(1,086,131 |
) | ||||
Operating income |
|
7,509 |
|
36,231 |
|
|
|
43,740 |
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(63,867 |
) |
(65 |
) |
|
|
(63,932 |
) | ||||
Other income |
|
5,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,975 |
| ||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest and income taxes |
|
(50,383 |
) |
36,166 |
|
|
|
(14,217 |
) | ||||
Income tax provision |
|
(1,493 |
) |
(14 |
) |
|
|
(1,507 |
) | ||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
163 |
| ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(51,876 |
) |
$ |
36,315 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(15,561 |
) |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
1,487,910 |
|
$ |
65,148 |
|
$ |
(20,055 |
) |
$ |
1,533,003 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
(1,464,720 |
) |
(29,216 |
) |
20,055 |
|
(1,473,881 |
) | ||||
Operating income |
|
23,190 |
|
35,932 |
|
|
|
59,122 |
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(59,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(59,952 |
) | ||||
Other expense |
|
656 |
|
|
|
|
|
656 |
| ||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest and income taxes |
|
(36,106 |
) |
35,932 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) | ||||
Income tax provision |
|
(886 |
) |
(12 |
) |
|
|
(898 |
) | ||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
130 |
| ||||
Net (loss) income attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(36,992 |
) |
$ |
36,050 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(942 |
) |
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flow
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(3,335 |
) |
$ |
47,916 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
44,581 |
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(393,866 |
) |
$ |
(547 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(394,413 |
) |
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
$ |
328,206 |
|
$ |
(46,989 |
) |
$ |
46,989 |
|
$ |
328,206 |
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
35,676 |
|
$ |
48,205 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
83,881 |
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(95,202 |
) |
$ |
(2,202 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(97,404 |
) |
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
$ |
1,388 |
|
$ |
(45,274 |
) |
$ |
45,274 |
|
$ |
1,388 |
|
(4) Other Long-term Liabilities
Prior to January 1, 2011, the Partnership entered into 9 and 10-year capital leases for certain equipment. Assets under capital leases as of September 30, 2012 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Compressor equipment |
|
$ |
37,199 |
|
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
(12,950 |
) | |
Net assets under capital leases |
|
$ |
24,249 |
|
The following are the minimum lease payments to be made in each of the following years indicated for the capital leases in effect as of September 30, 2012 (in thousands):
2012 |
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
2013 through 2016 ($4,582 annually) |
|
18,328 |
| |
Thereafter |
|
12,100 |
| |
Less: Interest |
|
(5,525 |
) | |
Net minimum lease payments under capital lease |
|
26,049 |
| |
Less: Current portion of net minimum lease payments |
|
(4,448 |
) | |
Long-term portion of net minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
21,601 |
|
Other long-term liabilities also include an inactive easement commitment of $7.1 million (net of discount of $2.9 million) assumed with the Clearfield acquisition which is due over the next 10 years as such easements are utilized and a long-term liability of $3.2 million assumed with the Clearfield acquisition for consulting services from the affiliate of the seller which is payable in monthly installments of $0.08 million over the next 5 years with a contract cancellation option by the affiliate of the seller in July 2014 that would cause the remaining liability to be payable at such time.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
(5) Partners Capital
(a) Issuance of Common Units
On May 15, 2012, we issued 10,120,000 common units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership at a public offering price of $16.28 per unit for net proceeds of $158.0 million. In addition, Crosstex Energy GP, LLC made a general partner contribution of $3.4 million in connection with the issuance to maintain its 2% general partner interest. The net proceeds from the common units offering were used for general partnership purposes.
On September 14, 2012, we issued 5,660,378 common units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership at a private offering price of $13.25 per unit for net proceeds of $74.8 million. The net proceeds from the common units issuance were used primarily to fund the Partnerships currently identified projects, including the Cajun-Sibon NGL pipeline expansion, and for general partnership purposes. Crosstex Energy GP, LLC did not make a general partner contribution to maintain its 2% general partner interest as discussed in the Amendment to Partnership Agreement section below.
(b) Amendment to Partnership Agreement
On September 13, 2012, the board of directors of the General Partner amended the Partnership Agreement to (i) convert the General Partners obligation to make capital contributions to the Partnership to maintain its 2% interest in connection with the issuance of additional limited partner interests by the Partnership to an option of the General Partner to make future capital contributions to maintain its then current general partner percentage interest and (ii) amend certain terms and conditions of the Series A Convertible Preferred Units (the Preferred Units), including, among other corresponding modifications, the following amendments:
· Distributions Paid-In-Kind (PIK): for each quarter through the quarter ending December 31, 2013 (the PIK Period), the Partnership will pay distributions in-kind on the Preferred Units (PIK Preferred Units) without penalty and without affecting the Partnerships ability to pay cash distributions on the common units.
· PIK Preferred Unit Price: during the PIK Period, the fixed price used to determine the number of PIK Preferred Units to be paid instead of cash distributions will increase from $8.50 per Preferred Unit to $13.25 per Preferred Unit.
· Optional Redemption: the existing right of the holders of Preferred Units to convert the Preferred Units into common units was modified so that such right may not be exercised until the earlier of (i) the business day following the record date for the distribution for the quarter ending December 31, 2013 and (ii) February 10, 2014.
· Mandatory Redemption: the right of the Partnership to convert the Preferred Units into common units on January 19, 2013 was modified so that such right may not be exercised until the business day following the distribution for the quarter ending December 31, 2013 (subject to the satisfaction of the existing conditions applicable to such right).
(c) Cash Distributions
Unless restricted by the terms of the Partnerships credit facility and/or the indentures governing our 2022 Notes and our 8 7/8% senior unsecured notes due 2018 (2018 Notes and, together with the 2022 Notes, all senior unsecured notes), the Partnership must make distributions of 100% of available cash, as defined in the partnership agreement, within 45 days following the end of each quarter.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
The Partnerships first quarter and second quarter 2012 distributions on its common and preferred units of $0.33 per unit were paid on May 15, 2012 and August 14, 2012, respectively. The Partnership declared its third quarter 2012 distribution on its common and preferred units of $0.33 per unit to be paid on November 14, 2012.
(d) Earnings per Unit and Dilution Computations
The Partnership had common units and Preferred Units outstanding during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011.
The Preferred Units are entitled to a quarterly distribution paid-in-kind equal to the greater of $0.2125 per unit or the amount of the quarterly distribution per unit paid to common unitholders, subject to certain adjustments. Income is allocated to the Preferred Units in an amount equal to the quarterly distribution with respect to the period earned. The fair value of the PIK Preferred Unit distributions will be based on the market value of common units on the record date of such distributions.
As required under FASB ASC 260-10-45-61A, unvested share-based payments that entitle employees to receive non-forfeitable distributions are considered participating securities, as defined in FASB ASC 260-10-20, for earnings per unit calculations. The following table reflects the computation of basic earnings per limited partner units for the periods presented (in thousands except per unit amounts):
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Limited partners interest in net loss |
|
$ |
(21,431 |
) |
$ |
(7,218 |
) |
$ |
(30,487 |
) |
$ |
(13,615 |
) |
Distributed earnings allocated to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common units (1)(2) |
|
$ |
20,948 |
|
$ |
15,705 |
|
$ |
55,752 |
|
$ |
46,020 |
|
Unvested restricted units (1)(2) |
|
310 |
|
298 |
|
1,008 |
|
883 |
| ||||
Total distributed earnings |
|
$ |
21,258 |
|
$ |
16,003 |
|
$ |
56,760 |
|
$ |
46,903 |
|
Undistributed loss allocated to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common units |
|
$ |
(41,977 |
) |
$ |
(22,808 |
) |
$ |
(85,676 |
) |
$ |
(59,411 |
) |
Unvested restricted units |
|
(712 |
) |
(413 |
) |
(1,571 |
) |
(1,107 |
) | ||||
Total undistributed loss |
|
$ |
(42,689 |
) |
$ |
(23,221 |
) |
$ |
(87,247 |
) |
$ |
(60,518 |
) |
Net loss allocated to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common units |
|
$ |
(21,029 |
) |
$ |
(7,103 |
) |
$ |
(29,924 |
) |
$ |
(13,393 |
) |
Unvested restricted units |
|
(402 |
) |
(115 |
) |
(563 |
) |
(222 |
) | ||||
Total limited partners interest in net loss |
|
$ |
(21,431 |
) |
$ |
(7,218 |
) |
$ |
(30,487 |
) |
$ |
(13,615 |
) |
Basic and diluted net loss per unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic and diluted common unit |
|
$ |
(0.34 |
) |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
(1) Three months ended September 30, 2012 represents a declared distribution of $0.33 per unit payable on November 14, 2012. Nine months ended September 30, 2012 represents distributions paid of $0.66 per unit and distributions declared of $0.33 payable November 14, 2012.
(2) Three months ended September 30, 2011 represents a declared distribution of $0.31 per unit paid on November 11, 2011. Nine months ended September 30, 2011 represents distributions paid of $0.60 per unit and distributions declared of $0.31 paid November 11, 2011.
The following are the unit amounts used to compute the basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
Basic and diluted weighted average units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average limited partner common units outstanding |
|
62,027 |
|
50,650 |
|
56,315 |
|
50,562 |
|
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
All common unit equivalents were antidilutive in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 because the limited partners were allocated net losses in these periods.
The general partner is entitled to a distribution in relation to its percentage interest with respect to all distributions made to common unitholders. If the distributions are in excess of $0.2125 per unit, distributions are made 100.0% to the common and preferred unitholders minus the general partners percentage interest, subject to the payment of incentive distributions as described below to the extent that certain target levels of cash distributions are achieved.
When quarterly distributions are made pro-rata to common and preferred unitholders, net income for the general partner consists of incentive distributions to the extent earned, a deduction for stock-based compensation attributable to CEIs stock options and restricted shares and the percentage interest of the original Partnerships net income (loss) adjusted for the CEI stock-based compensation specifically allocated to the general partner. When quarterly distributions are made solely to the preferred unitholders, the net income for the general partner consists of the CEI stock-based compensation deduction and the general partners percentage interest of the Partnerships net income (loss) after the allocation of income to the preferred unitholders with respect to their preferred distribution adjusted for the CEI stock-based compensation specifically allocated to the general partner.
Under the quarterly incentive distribution provisions, generally the Partnerships general partner is entitled to 13.0% of amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.25 per unit, 23.0% of the amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.3125 per unit and 48.0% of amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.375 per unit. The net income (loss) allocated to the general partner is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Income allocation for incentive distributions |
|
$ |
1,157 |
|
$ |
600 |
|
$ |
3,266 |
|
$ |
1,597 |
|
Stock-based compensation attributable to CEIs restricted shares |
|
(1,166 |
) |
(634 |
) |
(3,443 |
) |
(2,334 |
) | ||||
General partner interest in net income (loss) |
|
(300 |
) |
(42 |
) |
(243 |
) |
28 |
| ||||
General partner share of net loss |
|
$ |
(309 |
) |
$ |
(76 |
) |
$ |
(420 |
) |
$ |
(709 |
) |
(6) Employee Incentive Plans
(a) Long-Term Incentive Plans
The Partnership accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718, which requires compensation related to all stock-based awards, including stock options, be recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
The Partnership and CEI each have similar unit or share-based payment plans for employees, which are described below. Share-based compensation associated with the CEI share-based compensation plan awarded to officers and employees of the Partnership are recorded by the Partnership since CEI has no operating activities other than its interest in the Partnership. Amounts recognized in the condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to these plans are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Cost of share-based compensation charged to general and administrative expense |
|
$ |
2,193 |
|
$ |
1,304 |
|
$ |
6,546 |
|
$ |
4,569 |
|
Cost of share-based compensation charged to operating expense |
|
310 |
|
205 |
|
950 |
|
935 |
| ||||
Total amount charged to income |
|
$ |
2,503 |
|
$ |
1,509 |
|
$ |
7,496 |
|
$ |
5,504 |
|
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
(b) Restricted Units
The restricted units are valued at their fair value at the date of grant which is equal to the market value of common units on such date. A summary of the restricted unit activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 is provided below:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
| ||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Restricted Units: |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
| ||
Non-vested, beginning of period |
|
949,844 |
|
$ |
10.45 |
| |
Granted |
|
371,600 |
|
16.81 |
| ||
Vested* |
|
(261,768 |
) |
7.87 |
| ||
Forfeited |
|
(41,617 |
) |
15.02 |
| ||
Non-vested, end of period |
|
1,018,059 |
|
$ |
13.24 |
| |
Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in thousands) |
|
$ |
15,678 |
|
|
| |
* Vested units include 63,512 units withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees.
The Partnership issued restricted units in 2012 to officers and other employees. These restricted units typically vest at the end of three years and are included in the restricted units outstanding and the current share-based compensation cost calculations at September 30, 2012.
A summary of the restricted units aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of units vested (market value at date of grant) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are provided below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Restricted Units: |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Aggregate intrinsic value of units vested |
|
$ |
448 |
|
$ |
329 |
|
$ |
4,031 |
|
$ |
6,438 |
|
Fair value of units vested |
|
$ |
452 |
|
$ |
389 |
|
$ |
2,060 |
|
$ |
5,945 |
|
As of September 30, 2012, there was $6.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted units. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
(c) Unit Options
A summary of the unit option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 is provided below:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
| ||
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
| ||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Unit Options: |
|
Units |
|
Exercise Price |
| ||
Outstanding, beginning of period |
|
451,574 |
|
$ |
6.99 |
| |
Exercised |
|
(69,773 |
) |
5.03 |
| ||
Forfeited |
|
(11,281 |
) |
15.58 |
| ||
Outstanding, end of period |
|
370,520 |
|
$ |
7.11 |
| |
Options exercisable at end of period |
|
304,799 |
|
|
| ||
Weighted average contractual term (years) end of period: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Options outstanding |
|
6.4 |
|
|
| ||
Options exercisable |
|
6.2 |
|
|
| ||
Aggregate intrinsic value end of period (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Options outstanding |
|
$ |
3,513 |
|
|
| |
Options exercisable |
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
|
|
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
A summary of the unit options intrinsic value exercised (market value in excess of exercise price at date of exercise) and fair value of units exercised (value per Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model at date of grant) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 are provided below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Unit Options: |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Intrinsic value of unit options exercised |
|
$ |
327 |
|
$ |
348 |
|
$ |
805 |
|
$ |
1,333 |
|
Fair value of unit options vested |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
277 |
|
$ |
562 |
|
As of September 30, 2012, there was $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested unit options. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.3 years.
(d) Crosstex Energy, Inc.s Restricted Stock
CEIs restricted shares are valued at their fair value at the date of grant which is equal to the market value of the common stock on such date. A summary of the restricted share activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 is provided below:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, 2012 |
| ||||
Crosstex Energy, Inc. Restricted Shares: |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
| ||
Non-vested, beginning of period |
|
1,221,351 |
|
$ |
7.40 |
| |
Granted |
|
476,451 |
|
13.27 |
| ||
Vested* |
|
(282,494 |
) |
6.07 |
| ||
Forfeited |
|
(57,162 |
) |
11.01 |
| ||
Non-vested, end of period |
|
1,358,146 |
|
$ |
9.59 |
| |
Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in thousands) |
|
$ |
19,055 |
|
|
| |
* Vested shares include 62,546 shares withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees.
CEI issued restricted shares in 2012 to officers and other employees. These restricted shares typically vest at the end of three years and are included in restricted shares outstanding and the current share-based compensation cost calculations at September 30, 2012.
A summary of the restricted shares aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of shares vested (market value at date of grant) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 are provided below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
Crosstex Energy, Inc. Restricted Shares: |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Aggregate intrinsic value of shares vested |
|
$ |
537 |
|
$ |
226 |
|
$ |
3,963 |
|
$ |
3,915 |
|
Fair value of shares vested |
|
$ |
448 |
|
$ |
342 |
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
$ |
5,623 |
|
As of September 30, 2012 there was $6.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to CEI restricted shares for directors, officers and employees. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.
(e) Crosstex Energy, Inc.s Stock Options
CEI stock options have not been granted to officers or employees of the Partnership since 2005. There are 37,500 CEI stock options vested and exercisable at September 30, 2012.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
(7) Derivatives
Commodity Swaps
The Partnership manages its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices by hedging the impact of market fluctuations. Swaps are used to manage and hedge price and location risks related to these market exposures. Swaps are also used to manage margins on offsetting fixed-price purchase or sale commitments for physical quantities of natural gas and NGLs.
The Partnership commonly enters into various derivative financial transactions which it does not designate as accounting hedges. These transactions include swing swaps, third party on-system financial swaps, storage swaps, basis swaps, processing margin swaps, liquids swaps and put options. Swing swaps are generally short-term in nature (one month) and are usually entered into to protect against changes in the volume of daily versus first-of-month index priced gas supplies or markets. Third party on-system financial swaps are hedges that the Partnership enters into on behalf of its customers who are connected to its systems, wherein the Partnership fixes a supply or market price for a period of time for its customers, and simultaneously enters into the derivative transaction. Storage swap transactions protect against changes in the value of products that the Partnership has stored to serve various operational requirements (gas) or has in inventory due to short term constraints in moving the product to market (liquids). Basis swaps are used to hedge basis location price risk due to buying gas into one of the Partnerships systems on one index and selling gas off that same system on a different index. Processing margin financial swaps are used to hedge fractionation spread risk at the Partnerships processing plants relating to the option to process versus bypassing the Partnerships equity gas. Liquids financial swaps are used to hedge price risk on percent of liquids (POL) contracts. Put options are purchased to hedge against declines in pricing and as such represent options, not obligations, to sell the related underlying volumes at a fixed price.
The components of (gain) loss on derivatives in the condensed consolidated statements of operations relating to commodity swaps are provided below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Change in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting |
|
$ |
433 |
|
$ |
(619 |
) |
$ |
(5,481 |
) |
$ |
111 |
|
Realized losses on derivatives |
|
308 |
|
1,227 |
|
3,547 |
|
5,355 |
| ||||
Ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting |
|
18 |
|
(45 |
) |
(43 |
) |
(127 |
) | ||||
Net (gains) losses related to commodity swaps |
|
$ |
759 |
|
$ |
563 |
|
$ |
(1,977 |
) |
$ |
5,339 |
|
Put option premium mark to market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
| ||||
(Gains) losses on derivatives |
|
$ |
759 |
|
$ |
563 |
|
$ |
(1,977 |
) |
$ |
5,520 |
|
The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities relating to commodity swaps are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fair value of derivative assets current, designated |
|
$ |
888 |
|
$ |
151 |
|
Fair value of derivative assets current, non-designated |
|
3,448 |
|
2,716 |
| ||
Fair value of derivative assets long term, designated |
|
54 |
|
|
| ||
Fair value of derivative assets long term, non-designated |
|
696 |
|
|
| ||
Fair value of derivative liabilities current, designated |
|
(29 |
) |
(702 |
) | ||
Fair value of derivative liabilities current, non-designated |
|
(831 |
) |
(4,885 |
) | ||
Fair value of derivative liabilities long term, designated |
|
(11 |
) |
|
| ||
Fair value of derivative liabilities long term, non-designated |
|
(1 |
) |
|
| ||
Net fair value of derivatives |
|
$ |
4,214 |
|
$ |
(2,720 |
) |
Set forth below is the summarized notional volumes and fair value of all instruments held for price risk management purposes and related physical offsets as of September 30, 2012 (all gas volumes are expressed in MMBtus and liquids volumes are expressed in gallons). The remaining term of the contracts extend no later than December 2013 for derivatives. Changes in the fair value of the
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Partnerships mark to market derivatives are recorded in earnings in the period the transaction is entered into. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until the related anticipated future cash flow is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion is recorded in earnings immediately.
|
|
September 30, 2012 |
| |||
Transaction Type |
|
Volume |
|
Fair Value |
| |
|
|
(In thousands) |
| |||
Cash Flow Hedges:* |
|
|
|
|
| |
Liquids swaps (short contracts) |
|
(8,000 |
) |
$ |
902 |
|
Total swaps designated as cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
$ |
902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mark to Market Derivatives:* |
|
|
|
|
| |
Swing swaps (long contracts) |
|
186 |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Physical offsets to swing swap transactions (short contracts) |
|
(186 |
) |
|
| |
Swing swaps (short contracts) |
|
(620 |
) |
(3 |
) | |
Physical offsets to swing swap transactions (long contracts) |
|
620 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basis swaps (long contracts) |
|
775 |
|
(28 |
) | |
Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (short contracts) |
|
(775 |
) |
2,071 |
| |
Basis swaps (short contracts) |
|
(775 |
) |
23 |
| |
Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (long contracts) |
|
775 |
|
(2,233 |
) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Processing margin hedges liquids (short contracts) |
|
(8,791 |
) |
2,453 |
| |
Processing margin hedges gas (long contracts) |
|
1,167 |
|
(285 |
) | |
Processing margin hedges gas (short contracts) |
|
(161 |
) |
147 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Liquids swaps - non-designated (short contracts) |
|
(4,393 |
) |
1,126 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Storage swap transactions gas (short contracts) |
|
(300 |
) |
(77 |
) | |
Storage swap transactions liquids inventory (long contracts) |
|
630 |
|
17 |
| |
Storage swap transactions liquids inventory (short contracts) |
|
(1,470 |
) |
102 |
| |
Total mark to market derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
3,312 |
|
* All are gas contracts, volume in MMBtus, except for liquids swaps (designated or non-designated) and processing margin hedges - liquids (volume in gallons).
On all transactions where the Partnership is exposed to counterparty risk, the Partnership analyzes the counterpartys financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, establishes limits and monitors the appropriateness of these limits on an ongoing basis. The Partnership primarily deals with two types of counterparties, financial institutions and other energy companies, when entering into financial derivatives on commodities. The Partnership has entered into Master International Swaps and Derivatives Association Agreements (ISDAs) with its counterparties. If the Partnerships counterparties failed to perform under existing swap contracts entered into under these ISDAs, the Partnerships maximum loss as of September 30, 2012 of $5.7 million would be reduced to $5.1 million due to the offsetting of gross fair value payables against gross fair value receivables as allowed by the ISDAs.
Impact of Cash Flow Hedges
The impact of realized gains or losses from derivatives designated as cash flow hedge contracts in the condensed consolidated statements of operations is summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Midstream Revenue |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Liquids realized gain (loss) included in Midstream revenue |
|
$ |
456 |
|
$ |
(527 |
) |
$ |
851 |
|
$ |
(2,235 |
) |
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-(Continued)
Natural Gas
As of September 30, 2012, the Partnership had no balances in accumulated other comprehensive income related to natural gas.
Liquids
As of September 30, 2012, an unrealized derivative fair value net gain of $0.9 million related to cash flow hedges of liquids price risk was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. Of that amount, a net gain of $0.8 million is expected to be reclassified into earnings through September 2013. The actual reclassification to earnings will be based on mark to market prices at the contract settlement date, along with the realization of the gain or loss on the related physical volume, which is not reflected in the above table.
Derivatives Other Than Cash Flow Hedges
Assets and liabilities related to third party derivative contracts, swing swaps, basis swaps, storage swaps, processing margin swaps and liquids swaps are included in the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities and the profit and loss on the mark to market value of these contracts are recorded net as (gain) loss on derivatives in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. The Partnership estimates the fair value of all of its energy trading contracts using actively quoted prices. The estimated fair value of energy trading contracts by maturity date was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Maturity Periods |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Less than one year |
|
One to two years |
|
More than two years |
|
Total fair value |
| ||||
September 30, 2012. |
|
$ |
2,617 |
|
$ |
695 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,312 |
|
(8) Fair Value Measurements
FASB ASC 820 sets forth a framework for measuring fair value and required disclosures about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. Fair value under FASB ASC 820 is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liabilitys fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, use of unobservable prices or inputs are used to estimate the current fair value, often using an internal valuation model. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the item being valued.
FASB ASC 820 established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The Partnerships derivative contracts primarily consist of commodity swap contracts which are not traded on a public exchange. The fair values of commodity swap contracts are determined using discounted cash flow techniques. The techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs for future commodity prices that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. These market inputs are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instruments term, notional amount, discount rate and credit risk and are classified as Level 2 in hierarchy.
Net assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):
|