UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
x |
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
o |
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-50067
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
16-1616605 |
(State of organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2501 CEDAR SPRINGS |
|
|
DALLAS, TEXAS |
|
75201 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(214) 953-9500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x
As of July 27, 2012, the Registrant had 61,022,866 common units outstanding.
Item |
|
Description |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
Financial Statements |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
25 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
ASSETS |
| ||||||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
$ |
24,143 |
|
Restricted cash (1) |
|
245,100 |
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Trade, net of allowance for bad debt of $362 and $405, respectively |
|
37,258 |
|
22,680 |
| ||
Accrued revenue and other |
|
103,622 |
|
143,115 |
| ||
Fair value of derivative assets |
|
6,680 |
|
2,867 |
| ||
Natural gas and natural gas liquids, prepaid expenses and other |
|
22,860 |
|
9,951 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
420,479 |
|
202,756 |
| ||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $445,795 and $406,273, respectively |
|
1,285,968 |
|
1,241,901 |
| ||
Fair value of derivative assets |
|
1,604 |
|
|
| ||
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $224,729 and $199,248, respectively |
|
425,981 |
|
451,462 |
| ||
Investment in limited liability company |
|
87,250 |
|
35,000 |
| ||
Other assets, net |
|
22,953 |
|
24,212 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,244,235 |
|
$ |
1,955,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
| ||||||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable, drafts payable and other |
|
$ |
27,887 |
|
$ |
22,550 |
|
Accrued gas purchases |
|
76,787 |
|
106,232 |
| ||
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
2,839 |
|
5,587 |
| ||
Current portion of long-term debt (1) |
|
250,000 |
|
|
| ||
Other current liabilities |
|
45,162 |
|
66,065 |
| ||
Accrued interest |
|
27,036 |
|
24,918 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
429,711 |
|
225,352 |
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
762,357 |
|
798,409 |
| ||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
22,383 |
|
23,919 |
| ||
Deferred tax liability |
|
6,941 |
|
7,192 |
| ||
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
7 |
|
|
| ||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Partners equity |
|
1,022,836 |
|
900,459 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and partners equity |
|
$ |
2,244,235 |
|
$ |
1,955,331 |
|
(1) See Footnote 2 - 2022 Notes for additional information.
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit amounts) |
| ||||||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
351,194 |
|
$ |
525,735 |
|
$ |
722,903 |
|
$ |
1,015,505 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Purchased gas and NGLs |
|
260,890 |
|
429,177 |
|
532,846 |
|
829,111 |
| ||||
Operating expenses |
|
30,571 |
|
27,913 |
|
58,378 |
|
52,957 |
| ||||
General and administrative |
|
12,965 |
|
12,643 |
|
27,928 |
|
24,399 |
| ||||
Gain on sale of property |
|
(406 |
) |
(60 |
) |
(504 |
) |
(80 |
) | ||||
(Gain) loss on derivatives |
|
(4,905 |
) |
1,536 |
|
(2,736 |
) |
4,957 |
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
32,870 |
|
31,636 |
|
65,048 |
|
61,289 |
| ||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
331,985 |
|
502,845 |
|
680,960 |
|
972,633 |
| ||||
Operating income |
|
19,209 |
|
22,890 |
|
41,943 |
|
42,872 |
| ||||
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
(21,320 |
) |
(20,676 |
) |
(40,703 |
) |
(40,444 |
) | ||||
Other income (expenses) |
|
11 |
|
(241 |
) |
25 |
|
(129 |
) | ||||
Total other expense |
|
(21,309 |
) |
(20,917 |
) |
(40,678 |
) |
(40,573 |
) | ||||
Income (loss) before non-controlling interest and income taxes |
|
(2,100 |
) |
1,973 |
|
1,265 |
|
2,299 |
| ||||
Income tax provision |
|
(411 |
) |
(358 |
) |
(835 |
) |
(611 |
) | ||||
Net income (loss) |
|
(2,511 |
) |
1,615 |
|
430 |
|
1,688 |
| ||||
Less: Net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest |
|
(71 |
) |
(52 |
) |
(109 |
) |
(107 |
) | ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(2,440 |
) |
$ |
1,667 |
|
$ |
539 |
|
$ |
1,795 |
|
Preferred interest in net income attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
4,853 |
|
$ |
4,559 |
|
$ |
9,706 |
|
$ |
8,824 |
|
General partner interest in net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
$ |
(111 |
) |
$ |
(111 |
) |
$ |
(633 |
) |
Limited partners interest in net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(7,253 |
) |
$ |
(2,781 |
) |
$ |
(9,056 |
) |
$ |
(6,396 |
) |
Net loss attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. per limited partners unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic and diluted per common unit |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(2,511 |
) |
$ |
1,615 |
|
$ |
430 |
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
Hedging (gains) losses reclassified to earnings |
|
71 |
|
701 |
|
425 |
|
1,089 |
| ||||
Adjustment in fair value of derivatives |
|
1,796 |
|
(138 |
) |
1,757 |
|
(1,535 |
) | ||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
(644 |
) |
2,178 |
|
2,612 |
|
1,242 |
| ||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
71 |
|
52 |
|
109 |
|
107 |
| ||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(573 |
) |
$ |
2,230 |
|
$ |
2,721 |
|
$ |
1,349 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners Equity
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
Common Units |
|
Preferred Units |
|
Interest |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Non-Controlling |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
$ |
|
Units |
|
$ |
|
Units |
|
$ |
|
Units |
|
Income (loss) |
|
Interest |
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
730,010 |
|
50,677 |
|
$ |
147,770 |
|
14,706 |
|
$ |
20,322 |
|
1,334 |
|
$ |
(503 |
) |
$ |
2,860 |
|
$ |
900,459 |
|
Issuance of common units |
|
158,014 |
|
10,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,362 |
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
161,376 |
| ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of unit options |
|
203 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
| ||||||
Conversion of restricted units for common units, net of units withheld for taxes |
|
(980 |
) |
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(980 |
) | ||||||
Capital contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
| ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
2,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,993 |
| ||||||
Distributions |
|
(33,694 |
) |
|
|
(9,559 |
) |
|
|
(2,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,914 |
) | ||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
(9,056 |
) |
|
|
9,706 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
430 |
| ||||||
Hedging gains or losses reclassified to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
425 |
| ||||||
Adjustment in fair value of derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
| ||||||
Balance, June 30, 2012 |
|
$ |
847,159 |
|
61,009 |
|
$ |
147,917 |
|
14,706 |
|
$ |
23,330 |
|
1,545 |
|
$ |
1,679 |
|
$ |
2,751 |
|
$ |
1,022,836 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
430 |
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
65,048 |
|
61,289 |
| ||
Gain on sale of property |
|
(504 |
) |
(80 |
) | ||
Deferred tax benefit |
|
(250 |
) |
(250 |
) | ||
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
4,993 |
|
3,995 |
| ||
Non-cash portion of derivatives (gain) loss |
|
(5,975 |
) |
828 |
| ||
Amortization of debt issue costs |
|
1,321 |
|
4,065 |
| ||
Amortization of discount on notes |
|
948 |
|
948 |
| ||
Equity in loss of limited liability company |
|
|
|
236 |
| ||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable, accrued revenue and other |
|
24,906 |
|
(10,638 |
) | ||
Natural gas and natural gas liquids, prepaid expenses and other |
|
(8,971 |
) |
(5,403 |
) | ||
Accounts payable, accrued gas purchases and other accrued liabilities |
|
(29,655 |
) |
8,478 |
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
52,291 |
|
65,156 |
| ||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Additions to property and equipment |
|
(90,046 |
) |
(49,643 |
) | ||
Proceeds from sale of property |
|
632 |
|
107 |
| ||
Investment in limited liability company |
|
(52,250 |
) |
(35,000 |
) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(141,664 |
) |
(84,536 |
) | ||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
548,500 |
|
277,250 |
| ||
Payments on borrowings |
|
(335,500 |
) |
(232,308 |
) | ||
Increase in restricted cash |
|
(245,100 |
) |
|
| ||
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
(1,536 |
) |
(1,509 |
) | ||
Increase (decrease) in drafts payable |
|
(5,985 |
) |
3,165 |
| ||
Debt refinancing costs |
|
(4,962 |
) |
(3,792 |
) | ||
Conversion of restricted units, net of units withheld for taxes |
|
(980 |
) |
(1,740 |
) | ||
Issuance of common units |
|
158,014 |
|
|
| ||
Distribution to partners |
|
(45,914 |
) |
(37,589 |
) | ||
Proceeds from exercise of unit options |
|
203 |
|
392 |
| ||
Contributions from general partner |
|
3,449 |
|
145 |
| ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
70,189 |
|
4,014 |
| ||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(19,184 |
) |
(15,366 |
) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
24,143 |
|
17,697 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
$ |
2,331 |
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
36,252 |
|
$ |
35,936 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
784 |
|
$ |
752 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
(1) General
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to we, us, our or the Partnership mean Crosstex Energy, L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Crosstex Energy, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 12, 2002, is engaged in the gathering, transmission, processing and marketing of natural gas, natural gas liquids, or NGLs, and providing terminal services for crude oil. The Partnership connects the wells of natural gas producers in the geographic areas of its gathering systems in order to gather for a fee or purchase the gas production, processes natural gas for the removal of NGLs, transports natural gas and NGLs and ultimately provides natural gas and NGLs to a variety of markets. The Partnership operates processing plants that process gas transported to the plants by major interstate pipelines or from our own gathering systems under a variety of fee arrangements. In addition, the Partnership purchases natural gas and NGLs from producers not connected to its gathering systems for resale and markets natural gas and NGLs on behalf of producers for a fee. The Partnership recently added crude oil terminal facilities in south Louisiana to provide access for crude oil producers to the premium markets in this area.
Crosstex Energy GP, LLC is the general partner of the Partnership. Crosstex Energy GP, LLC is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Crosstex Energy, Inc. (CEI).
(a) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, are unaudited and do not include all the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods have been made and are of a recurring nature unless otherwise disclosed herein. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for a full year. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial statements for the prior year to conform to the current presentation. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Partnerships annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management of the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
(b) Investment in Limited Liability Company
On June 22, 2011, the Partnership entered into a limited liability agreement with Howard Energy Partners (HEP) for an initial capital contribution of $35.0 million in exchange for an individual ownership interest in HEP. In 2012, the Partnership made an additional capital contribution of $52.3 million to HEP related to HEPs acquisition of substantially all of Meritage Midstream Services natural gas gathering assets in south Texas. HEP owns midstream assets and provides midstream and construction services to Eagle Ford Shale producers. The Partnership owns 30.6 percent of HEP and accounts for this investment under the equity method of accounting. This investment is reflected on the balance sheet as Investment in limited liability company.
(c) Potential Changes in use of Sabine Plant during 2012
Currently, the Partnerships Sabine plant has a contract with a third-party to fractionate the raw-make NGLs produced by the Sabine plant. The primary term of the contract expired on June 30, 2012 and is currently renewed on a month-to-month basis. The Partnership will negotiate with this third-party to try to establish a long-term fractionation agreement. If this third-party ceases to fractionate the produced NGLs from the Sabine plant and the Partnership is unsuccessful in determining another alternative for our Sabine customers, the Partnership will cease operation of the Sabine plant. Although the Partnership does not have specific plans at this time to relocate the Sabine plant if it is idled, the Partnership may utilize it elsewhere in its operations. The net book value of the Sabine plant was $46.4 million (including $13.3 million of intangible assets attributable to customer relationships) as of June 30, 2012. If the plant is idled on a long-term basis, an impairment may be recorded to expense the non-recoverable costs associated with the plants current location, which are estimated to be approximately $27.0 million based on the net book value as of June 30, 2012.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(d) Clearfield Acquisition
On July 2, 2012, the Partnership, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, completed its previously announced acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Clearfield Energy, Inc. and Clearfield Energys wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, Clearfield). Clearfield is a well-established crude oil, condensate and water services company with operations in Ohio, Kentucky and West Virginia. Clearfields business includes crude oil pipelines, a barge loading terminal on the Ohio River, a rail loading terminal on the Ohio Central Railroad network, a trucking fleet, and brine water disposal wells.
The Partnership paid approximately $210.0 million in cash for the acquisition and the purchase was funded from restricted cash that resulted from the senior notes offering in May 2012. The assets associated with this acquisition will be included in a new reporting segment that will be referred to as Ohio River Valley. Pro-forma financial statements for the Clearfield acquisition are available on our amended Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 1, 2012.
(2) Long-Term Debt
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
Bank credit facility (due 2016), interest based on Prime and/or LIBOR plus an applicable margin, interest rate at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was 3.33% and 2.9%, respectively |
|
$ |
48,000 |
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
Senior unsecured notes (due 2018), net of discount of $10.6 million and $11.6 million, respectively, which bear interest at the rate of 8.875% |
|
714,357 |
|
713,409 |
| ||
Senior unsecured notes (due 2022), which bear interest at the rate of 7.125% |
|
250,000 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
1,012,357 |
|
798,409 |
| ||
Less current portion |
|
(250,000 |
) |
|
| ||
Debt classified as long-term |
|
$ |
762,357 |
|
$ |
798,409 |
|
Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2012, there was $57.6 million in outstanding letters of credit and $48.0 million borrowed under the Partnerships bank credit facility, leaving approximately $529.4 million available for future borrowing based on the borrowing capacity of $635.0 million.
In January, 2012, the Partnership amended its credit facility. This amendment increased its borrowing capacity from $485.0 million to $635.0 million and amended certain terms under the facility to provide additional financial flexibility during the remaining four-year term of the facility.
In May 2012, the Partnership amended its credit facility. The amendment to the Partnerships credit facility, among other things, (i) increased the maximum permitted consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the amended credit facility, being generally computed as the ratio of total funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-cash charges) during the Clearfield acquisition period (as defined in the amended credit facility, being generally the four quarterly
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
measurement periods after closing the Clearfield acquisition) from 5.0 to 1.0 to 5.5 to 1.0, and (ii) increased the maximum permitted consolidated leverage ratio during any other acquisition period (as defined in the amended credit facility, being generally the three quarterly measurement periods after closing certain material acquisitions) from 5.0 to 1.0 to 5.5 to 1.0.
The credit facility is guaranteed by substantially all of the Partnerships subsidiaries and is secured by first priority liens on substantially all of the Partnerships assets and those of the guarantors, including all material pipeline, gas gathering and processing assets, all material working capital assets and a pledge of all of the Partnerships equity interests in substantially all of its subsidiaries and its interest in HEP. The Partnership may prepay all loans under the amended credit facility at any time without premium or penalty (other than customary LIBOR breakage costs), subject to certain notice requirements.
All material terms of the credit facility are described in Part II, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Indebtedness in the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Partnership expects to be in compliance with all credit facility covenants for at least the next twelve months.
2022 Notes. On May 24, 2012, the Partnership issued $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.125% senior unsecured notes (the 2022 Notes) due on June 1, 2022 at an issue price of 100% of the principal amount to yield 7.125% to maturity. The interest payments are due semi-annually in arrears in June and December. The Partnership placed into escrow the net proceeds of $245.1 million from the offering of the 2022 Notes pending completion of the Clearfield acquisition. The net proceeds are classified as restricted cash as of June 30, 2012 and the 2022 Notes are classified as current debt as of June 30, 2012. Upon closing of the Clearfield acquisition on July 2, 2012, the 2022 Notes were reclassified as long term debt and the restricted cash was used to fund the Clearfield acquisition and for general partnership purposes, including capital expenditures for the Cajun-Sibon natural gas liquids pipeline expansion.
The Partnership may redeem up to 35% of the 2022 Notes at any time prior to June 1, 2015 with the cash proceeds from equity offerings at a redemption price of 107.125% of the principal amount of the 2022 Notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date).
Prior to June 1, 2017, the Partnership may redeem all or a part of the 2022 Notes at the redemption price equal to the sum of the principal amount thereof, plus a make-whole premium at the redemption date, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
On or after June 1, 2017, the Partnership may redeem all or a part of the 2022 Notes at redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) equal to 103.563% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2017, 102.375% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2018, 101.188% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2019 and 100.000% for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1, 2020 and at any time thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date on the 2022 Notes.
Under the terms of the indenture governing the 2022 Notes agreement, repurchase offer obligations would be triggered by a change of control combined with a ratings decline on the notes. All other material terms of the senior unsecured notes are described in footnote 4 to the consolidated financial statements in the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Non-Guarantors. All senior unsecured notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by each of the Partnerships current material subsidiaries (the Guarantors), with the exception of its regulated Louisiana subsidiaries (which may only guarantee up to $500.0 million of the Partnerships debt), CDC (the Partnerships joint venture in Denton County, Texas which is not 100% owned by the Partnership) and Crosstex Energy Finance Corporation (a wholly owned Delaware corporation that was organized for the sole purpose of being a co-issuer of certain of the Partnerships indebtedness, including the senior unsecured notes). Guarantors may not sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of their properties or assets, or consolidate with or merge into another company if such a sale would cause a default under the terms of the senior unsecured notes. Since certain wholly owned subsidiaries do not guarantee the senior unsecured notes, the condensed consolidating financial statements of the guarantors and non-guarantors for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are disclosed below in accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X. Comprehensive income (loss) is not included in the condensed consolidating statements of operations of the guarantors and non-guarantors for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 as these amounts are not considered material.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
June 30, 2012
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total current assets |
|
$ |
405,623 |
|
$ |
14,856 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
420,479 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1,076,248 |
|
209,720 |
|
|
|
1,285,968 |
| ||||
Total other assets |
|
537,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
537,788 |
| ||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,019,659 |
|
$ |
224,576 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,244,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
424,239 |
|
$ |
5,472 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
429,711 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
762,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
762,357 |
| ||||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
29,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
29,331 |
| ||||
Partners capital |
|
803,732 |
|
219,104 |
|
|
|
1,022,836 |
| ||||
Total liabilities & partners capital |
|
$ |
2,019,659 |
|
$ |
224,576 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,244,235 |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total current assets |
|
$ |
189,410 |
|
$ |
13,346 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
202,756 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1,026,537 |
|
215,364 |
|
|
|
1,241,901 |
| ||||
Total other assets |
|
510,671 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
510,674 |
| ||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,726,618 |
|
$ |
228,713 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,955,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
220,811 |
|
$ |
4,541 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
225,352 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
798,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
798,409 |
| ||||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
31,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
31,111 |
| ||||
Partners capital |
|
676,287 |
|
224,172 |
|
|
|
900,459 |
| ||||
Total liabilities & partners capital |
|
$ |
1,726,618 |
|
$ |
228,713 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,955,331 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
336,828 |
|
$ |
22,200 |
|
$ |
(7,834 |
) |
$ |
351,194 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
(330,072 |
) |
(9,747 |
) |
7,834 |
|
(331,985 |
) | ||||
Operating income |
|
6,756 |
|
12,453 |
|
|
|
19,209 |
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(21,320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(21,320 |
) | ||||
Other income |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
| ||||
Income (loss) before non-controlling interest and income taxes |
|
(14,553 |
) |
12,453 |
|
|
|
(2,100 |
) | ||||
Income tax provision |
|
(408 |
) |
(3 |
) |
|
|
(411 |
) | ||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
71 |
| ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(14,961 |
) |
$ |
12,521 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(2,440 |
) |
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
511,104 |
|
$ |
21,957 |
|
$ |
(7,326 |
) |
$ |
525,735 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
(499,421 |
) |
(10,750 |
) |
7,326 |
|
(502,845 |
) | ||||
Operating income |
|
11,683 |
|
11,207 |
|
|
|
22,890 |
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(20,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(20,676 |
) | ||||
Other expense |
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(241 |
) | ||||
(Loss) income before non-controlling interest and income taxes |
|
(9,234 |
) |
11,207 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
| ||||
Income tax provision |
|
(354 |
) |
(4 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) | ||||
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
| ||||
Net (loss) income attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(9,588 |
) |
$ |
11,255 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,667 |
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
693,981 |
|
$ |
44,477 |
|
$ |
(15,555 |
) |
$ |
722,903 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
(677,659 |
) |
(18,856 |
) |
15,555 |
|
(680,960 |
) | ||||
Operating income |
|
16,322 |
|
25,621 |
|
|
|
41,943 |
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(40,646 |
) |
(57 |
) |
|
|
(40,703 |
) | ||||
Other income |
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
| ||||
Income (loss) before non-controlling interest and income taxes |
|
(24,299 |
) |
25,564 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
| ||||
Income tax provision |
|
(828 |
) |
(7 |
) |
|
|
(835 |
) | ||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
109 |
| ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(25,127 |
) |
$ |
25,666 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
986,044 |
|
$ |
43,860 |
|
$ |
(14,399 |
) |
$ |
1,015,505 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
(967,573 |
) |
(19,459 |
) |
14,399 |
|
(972,633 |
) | ||||
Operating income |
|
18,471 |
|
24,401 |
|
|
|
42,872 |
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(40,444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(40,444 |
) | ||||
Other expense |
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(129 |
) | ||||
(Loss) income before non-controlling interest and income taxes |
|
(22,102 |
) |
24,401 |
|
|
|
2,299 |
| ||||
Income tax provision |
|
(603 |
) |
(8 |
) |
|
|
(611 |
) | ||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
| ||||
Net (loss) income attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P. |
|
$ |
(22,705 |
) |
$ |
24,500 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,795 |
|
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flow
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
20,468 |
|
$ |
31,823 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
52,291 |
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(141,037 |
) |
$ |
(627 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(141,664 |
) |
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
$ |
70,189 |
|
$ |
(30,626 |
) |
$ |
30,626 |
|
$ |
70,189 |
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
Guarantors |
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
33,900 |
|
$ |
31,256 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
65,156 |
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(82,176 |
) |
$ |
(2,360 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(84,536 |
) |
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
$ |
4,014 |
|
$ |
(28,217 |
) |
$ |
28,217 |
|
$ |
4,014 |
|
(3) Other Long-term Liabilities
Prior to January 1, 2011, the Partnership entered into 9 and 10-year capital leases for certain equipment. Assets under capital leases as of June 30, 2012 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Compressor equipment |
|
$ |
37,199 |
|
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
(12,087 |
) | |
Net assets under capital leases |
|
$ |
25,112 |
|
The following are the minimum lease payments to be made in each of the following years indicated for the capital leases in effect as of June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
2012 |
|
$ |
2,291 |
|
2013 through 2016 ($4,582 annually) |
|
18,328 |
| |
Thereafter |
|
12,100 |
| |
Less: Interest |
|
(5,888 |
) | |
Net minimum lease payments under capital lease |
|
26,831 |
| |
Less: Current portion of net minimum lease payments |
|
(4,448 |
) | |
Long-term portion of net minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
22,383 |
|
(4) Partners Capital
(a) Issuance of Common Units
On May 15, 2012, we issued 10,200,000 common units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership at a public offering price of $16.28 per unit for net proceeds of $158.0 million. In addition, Crosstex Energy GP, LLC made a general partner contribution of $3.4 million in connection with the issuance to maintain its 2% general partner interest. The net proceeds from the common units offering were used for general partnership purposes.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(b) Cash Distributions
Unless restricted by the terms of the Partnerships credit facility and/or the indentures governing our 2022 Notes and our 8 7/8% senior unsecured notes due 2018 (2018 Notes and, together with the 2022 Notes, all senior unsecured notes), the Partnership must make distributions of 100% of available cash, as defined in the partnership agreement, within 45 days following the end of each quarter.
The Partnerships first quarter 2012 distribution on its common and preferred units of $0.33 per unit was paid on May 15, 2012. The Partnership declared its second quarter 2012 distribution on its common and preferred units of $0.33 per unit to be paid on August 14, 2012.
(c) Earnings per Unit and Dilution Computations
The Partnership had common units and preferred units outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011.
The preferred units are entitled to a quarterly distribution equal to the greater of $0.2125 per unit or the amount of the quarterly distribution per unit paid to common unitholders, subject to certain adjustments. Income is allocated to the preferred units in an amount equal to the quarterly distribution with respect to the period earned.
As required under FASB ASC 260-10-45-61A, unvested share-based payments that entitle employees to receive non-forfeitable distributions are considered participating securities, as defined in FASB ASC 260-10-20, for earnings per unit calculations. The following table reflects the computation of basic earnings per limited partner units for the periods presented (in thousands except per unit amounts):
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Limited partners interest in net loss |
|
$ |
(7,253 |
) |
$ |
(2,781 |
) |
$ |
(9,056 |
) |
$ |
(6,396 |
) |
Distributed earnings allocated to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common units (1)(2) |
|
$ |
18,021 |
|
$ |
15,691 |
|
$ |
34,804 |
|
$ |
30,316 |
|
Unvested restricted units (1)(2) |
|
359 |
|
286 |
|
698 |
|
585 |
| ||||
Total distributed earnings |
|
$ |
18,380 |
|
$ |
15,977 |
|
$ |
35,502 |
|
$ |
30,901 |
|
Undistributed loss allocated to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common units |
|
$ |
(25,148 |
) |
$ |
(18,374 |
) |
$ |
(43,699 |
) |
$ |
(36,605 |
) |
Unvested restricted units |
|
(485 |
) |
(384 |
) |
(859 |
) |
(692 |
) | ||||
Total undistributed loss |
|
$ |
(25,633 |
) |
$ |
(18,758 |
) |
$ |
(44,558 |
) |
$ |
(37,297 |
) |
Net loss allocated to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common units |
|
$ |
(7,127 |
) |
$ |
(2,683 |
) |
$ |
(8,895 |
) |
$ |
(6,289 |
) |
Unvested restricted units |
|
(126 |
) |
(98 |
) |
(161 |
) |
(107 |
) | ||||
Total limited partners interest in net loss |
|
$ |
(7,253 |
) |
$ |
(2,781 |
) |
$ |
(9,056 |
) |
$ |
(6,396 |
) |
Basic and diluted net loss per unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic and diluted common unit |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
(1) Three months ended June 30, 2012 represents a declared distribution of $0.33 per unit payable on August 14, 2012. Six months ended June 30, 2012 represents distributions paid of $0.33 per unit and distributions declared of $0.33 payable August 14, 2012.
(2) Three months ended June 30, 2011 represents a declared distribution of $0.31 per unit paid on August 12, 2011. Six months ended June 30, 2011 represents distributions paid of $0.29 per unit and distributions declared of $0.31 paid August 12, 2011.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The following are the unit amounts used to compute the basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
Basic and diluted weighted average units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average limited partner common units outstanding |
|
55,998 |
|
50,563 |
|
53,427 |
|
50,518 |
|
All common unit equivalents were antidilutive in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 because the limited partners were allocated net losses in these periods.
The general partner is entitled to a 2.0% distribution with respect to all distributions made to common unitholders. If the distributions are in excess of $0.2125 per unit, distributions are made 98.0% to the common and preferred unitholders and 2.0% to the general partner, subject to the payment of incentive distributions as described below to the extent that certain target levels of cash distributions are achieved.
When quarterly distributions are made pro-rata to common and preferred unitholders, net income for the general partner consists of incentive distributions to the extent earned, a deduction for stock-based compensation attributable to CEIs stock options and restricted shares and 2.0% of the original Partnerships net income (loss) adjusted for the CEI stock-based compensation specifically allocated to the general partner. When quarterly distributions are made solely to the preferred unitholders, the net income for the general partner consists of the CEI stock-based compensation deduction and 2.0% of the Partnerships net income (loss) after the allocation of income to the preferred unitholders with respect to their preferred distribution adjusted for the CEI stock-based compensation specifically allocated to the general partner.
Under the quarterly incentive distribution provisions, generally the Partnerships general partner is entitled to 13.0% of amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.25 per unit, 23.0% of the amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.3125 per unit and 48.0% of amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.375 per unit. The net income (loss) allocated to the general partner is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Income allocation for incentive distributions |
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
$ |
599 |
|
$ |
2,108 |
|
$ |
997 |
|
Stock-based compensation attributable to CEIs restricted shares |
|
(1,144 |
) |
(759 |
) |
(2,276 |
) |
(1,700 |
) | ||||
2% general partner interest in net income (loss) |
|
(26 |
) |
49 |
|
57 |
|
70 |
| ||||
General partner share of net loss |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
$ |
(111 |
) |
$ |
(111 |
) |
$ |
(633 |
) |
(5) Employee Incentive Plans
(a) Long-Term Incentive Plans
The Partnership accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718, which requires compensation related to all stock-based awards, including stock options, be recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
The Partnership and CEI each have similar unit or share-based payment plans for employees, which are described below. Share-based compensation associated with the CEI share-based compensation plan awarded to officers and employees of the Partnership are recorded by the Partnership since CEI has no operating activities other than its interest in the Partnership. Amounts recognized in the condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to these plans are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Cost of share-based compensation charged to general and administrative expense |
|
$ |
2,179 |
|
$ |
1,540 |
|
$ |
4,353 |
|
$ |
3,266 |
|
Cost of share-based compensation charged to operating expense |
|
316 |
|
265 |
|
640 |
|
729 |
| ||||
Total amount charged to income |
|
$ |
2,495 |
|
$ |
1,805 |
|
$ |
4,993 |
|
$ |
3,995 |
|
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(b) Restricted Units
The restricted units are valued at their fair value at the date of grant which is equal to the market value of common units on such date. A summary of the restricted unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is provided below:
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
| ||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Restricted Units: |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
| ||
Non-vested, beginning of period |
|
949,844 |
|
$ |
10.45 |
| |
Granted |
|
352,912 |
|
16.53 |
| ||
Vested* |
|
(232,700 |
) |
6.91 |
| ||
Forfeited |
|
(13,954 |
) |
12.73 |
| ||
Non-vested, end of period |
|
1,056,102 |
|
$ |
13.23 |
| |
Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in thousands) |
|
$ |
17,320 |
|
|
| |
* Vested units include 60,401 units withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees.
The Partnership issued restricted units in 2012 to officers and other employees. These restricted units typically vest at the end of three years and are included in the restricted units outstanding and the current share-based compensation cost calculations at June 30, 2012.
A summary of the restricted units aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of units vested (market value at date of grant) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are provided below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Restricted Units: |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Aggregate intrinsic value of units vested |
|
$ |
280 |
|
$ |
1,870 |
|
$ |
3,806 |
|
$ |
6,109 |
|
Fair value of units vested |
|
$ |
281 |
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
$ |
1,608 |
|
$ |
5,556 |
|
As of June 30, 2012, there was $7.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years.
(c) Unit Options
A summary of the unit option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is provided below:
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
| ||
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
| ||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Unit Options: |
|
Units |
|
Exercise Price |
| ||
Outstanding, beginning of period |
|
451,574 |
|
$ |
6.99 |
| |
Exercised |
|
(40,246 |
) |
5.06 |
| ||
Forfeited |
|
(10,433 |
) |
16.34 |
| ||
Outstanding, end of period |
|
400,895 |
|
$ |
6.95 |
| |
Options exercisable at end of period |
|
334,326 |
|
|
| ||
Weighted average contractual term (years) end of period: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Options outstanding |
|
6.7 |
|
|
| ||
Options exercisable |
|
6.5 |
|
|
| ||
Aggregate intrinsic value end of period (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Options outstanding |
|
$ |
4,201 |
|
|
| |
Options exercisable |
|
$ |
3,508 |
|
|
|
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
A summary of the unit options intrinsic value exercised (market value in excess of exercise price at date of exercise) and fair value of units exercised (value per Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model at date of grant) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 are provided below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Unit Options: |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Intrinsic value of unit options exercised |
|
$ |
67 |
|
$ |
479 |
|
$ |
478 |
|
$ |
985 |
|
Fair value of unit options vested |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
$ |
277 |
|
$ |
561 |
|
As of June 30, 2012, there was $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested unit options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.5 years.
(d) Crosstex Energy, Inc.s Restricted Stock
CEIs restricted shares are valued at their fair value at the date of grant which is equal to the market value of the common stock on such date. A summary of the restricted share activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is provided below:
|
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
June 30, 2012 |
| ||||
Crosstex Energy, Inc. Restricted Shares: |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
| ||
Non-vested, beginning of period |
|
1,221,351 |
|
$ |
7.40 |
| |
Granted |
|
454,146 |
|
13.28 |
| ||
Vested* |
|
(244,195 |
) |
5.18 |
| ||
Forfeited |
|
(18,850 |
) |
8.60 |
| ||
Non-vested, end of period |
|
1,412,452 |
|
$ |
9.66 |
| |
Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in thousands) |
|
$ |
19,774 |
|
|
| |
* Vested shares include 58,247 shares withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees.
CEI issued restricted shares in 2012 to officers and other employees. These restricted shares typically vest at the end of three years and are included in restricted shares outstanding and the current share-based compensation cost calculations at June 30, 2012.
A summary of the restricted shares aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of shares vested (market value at date of grant) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 are provided below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
Crosstex Energy, Inc. Restricted Shares: |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Aggregate intrinsic value of shares vested |
|
$ |
391 |
|
$ |
1,111 |
|
$ |
3,127 |
|
$ |
3,689 |
|
Fair value of shares vested |
|
$ |
260 |
|
$ |
2,391 |
|
$ |
1,266 |
|
$ |
5,281 |
|
As of June 30, 2012 there was $7.6 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to CEI non-vested restricted shares. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(e) Crosstex Energy, Inc.s Stock Options
CEI stock options have not been granted to officers or employees of the Partnership since 2005. There are 37,500 CEI stock options vested and exercisable at June 30, 2012.
(6) Derivatives
Commodity Swaps
The Partnership manages its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices by hedging the impact of market fluctuations. Swaps are used to manage and hedge price and location risks related to these market exposures. Swaps are also used to manage margins on offsetting fixed-price purchase or sale commitments for physical quantities of natural gas and NGLs.
The Partnership commonly enters into various derivative financial transactions which it does not designate as accounting hedges. These transactions include swing swaps, third party on-system financial swaps, storage swaps, basis swaps, processing margin swaps, liquids swaps and put options. Swing swaps are generally short-term in nature (one month) and are usually entered into to protect against changes in the volume of daily versus first-of-month index priced gas supplies or markets. Third party on-system financial swaps are hedges that the Partnership enters into on behalf of its customers who are connected to its systems, wherein the Partnership fixes a supply or market price for a period of time for its customers, and simultaneously enters into the derivative transaction. Storage swap transactions protect against changes in the value of products that the Partnership has stored to serve various operational requirements (gas) or has in inventory due to short term constraints in moving the product to market (liquids). Basis swaps are used to hedge basis location price risk due to buying gas into one of the Partnerships systems on one index and selling gas off that same system on a different index. Processing margin financial swaps are used to hedge fractionation spread risk at the Partnerships processing plants relating to the option to process versus bypassing the Partnerships equity gas. Liquids financial swaps are used to hedge price risk on percent of liquids (POL) contracts. Put options are purchased to hedge against declines in pricing and as such represent options, not obligations, to sell the related underlying volumes at a fixed price.
The components of (gain) loss on derivatives in the condensed consolidated statements of operations relating to commodity swaps are provided below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Change in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting |
|
$ |
(7,095 |
) |
$ |
(825 |
) |
$ |
(5,913 |
) |
$ |
730 |
|
Realized losses on derivatives |
|
2,213 |
|
2,368 |
|
3,238 |
|
4,128 |
| ||||
Ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting |
|
(23 |
) |
(101 |
) |
(61 |
) |
(82 |
) | ||||
Net (gains) losses related to commodity swaps |
|
$ |
(4,905 |
) |
$ |
1,442 |
|
$ |
(2,736 |
) |
$ |
4,776 |
|
Put option premium mark to market |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
181 |
| ||||
(Gains) losses on derivatives |
|
$ |
(4,905 |
) |
$ |
1,536 |
|
$ |
(2,736 |
) |
$ |
4,957 |
|
The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities relating to commodity swaps are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fair value of derivative assets current, designated |
|
$ |
1,568 |
|
$ |
151 |
|
Fair value of derivative assets current, non-designated |
|
5,112 |
|
2,716 |
| ||
Fair value of derivative assets long term, designated |
|
125 |
|
|
| ||
Fair value of derivative assets long term, non-designated |
|
1,479 |
|
|
| ||
Fair value of derivative liabilities current, designated |
|
|
|
(702 |
) | ||
Fair value of derivative liabilities current, non-designated |
|
(2,839 |
) |
(4,885 |
) | ||
Fair value of derivative liabilities long term, non-designated |
|
(7 |
) |
|
| ||
Net fair value of derivatives |
|
$ |
5,438 |
|
$ |
(2,720 |
) |
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Set forth below is the summarized notional volumes and fair value of all instruments held for price risk management purposes and related physical offsets as of June 30, 2012 (all gas volumes are expressed in MMBtus and liquids volumes are expressed in gallons). The remaining term of the contracts extend no later than December 2013 for derivatives. Changes in the fair value of the Partnerships mark to market derivatives are recorded in earnings in the period the transaction is entered into. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until the related anticipated future cash flow is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion is recorded in earnings immediately.
|
|
June 30, 2012 |
| |||
Transaction Type |
|
Volume |
|
Fair Value |
| |
|
|
(In thousands) |
| |||
Cash Flow Hedges:* |
|
|
|
|
| |
Liquids swaps (short contracts) |
|
(5,705 |
) |
$ |
1,693 |
|
Total swaps designated as cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
$ |
1,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mark to Market Derivatives:* |
|
|
|
|
| |
Swing swaps (long contracts) |
|
419 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
Physical offsets to swing swap transactions (short contracts) |
|
(419 |
) |
|
| |
Swing swaps (short contracts) |
|
(4,588 |
) |
(35 |
) | |
Physical offsets to swing swap transactions (long contracts) |
|
4,588 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basis swaps (long contracts) |
|
2,501 |
|
(30 |
) | |
Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (short contracts) |
|
(2,501 |
) |
5,189 |
| |
Basis swaps (short contracts) |
|
(2,501 |
) |
15 |
| |
Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (long contracts) |
|
2,501 |
|
(6,624 |
) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Third-party on-system swaps (long contracts) |
|
155 |
|
|
| |
Physical offsets to third-party on-system swap transactions (short contracts) |
|
(155 |
) |
(22 |
) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Processing margin hedges liquids (short contracts) |
|
(9,064 |
) |
4,210 |
| |
Processing margin hedges gas (long contracts) |
|
1,188 |
|
(1,035 |
) | |
Processing margin hedges gas (short contracts) |
|
(187 |
) |
240 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Liquids swaps - non-designated (short contracts) |
|
(4,393 |
) |
1,471 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Storage swap transactions gas (long contracts) |
|
210 |
|
116 |
| |
Storage swap transactions gas (short contracts) |
|
(290 |
) |
62 |
| |
Storage swap transactions liquids inventory (long contracts) |
|
1,470 |
|
(25 |
) | |
Storage swap transactions liquids inventory (short contracts) |
|
(4,830 |
) |
210 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total mark to market derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
3,745 |
|
* All are gas contracts, volume in MMBtus, except for liquids swaps (designated or non-designated) and processing margin hedges - liquids (volume in gallons).
On all transactions where the Partnership is exposed to counterparty risk, the Partnership analyzes the counterpartys financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, establishes limits and monitors the appropriateness of these limits on an ongoing basis. The Partnership primarily deals with two types of counterparties, financial institutions and other energy companies, when entering into financial derivatives on commodities. The Partnership has entered into Master International Swaps and Derivatives Association Agreements (ISDAs) with its counterparties. If the Partnerships counterparties failed to perform under existing swap contracts entered into under these ISDAs, the Partnerships maximum loss as of June 30, 2012 of $13.5 million would be reduced to $12.1 million due to the offsetting of gross fair value payables against gross fair value receivables as allowed by the ISDAs.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Impact of Cash Flow Hedges
The impact of realized gains or losses from derivatives designated as cash flow hedge contracts in the condensed consolidated statements of operations is summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Midstream Revenue |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Liquids realized loss included in Midstream revenue |
|
$ |
407 |
|
$ |
(1,048 |
) |
$ |
395 |
|
$ |
(1,708 |
) |
Natural Gas
As of June 30, 2012, the Partnership has no balances in accumulated other comprehensive income related to natural gas.
Liquids
As of June 30, 2012, an unrealized derivative fair value net gain of $1.7 million related to cash flow hedges of liquids price risk was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. Of that amount, a net gain of $1.6 million is expected to be reclassified into earnings through June 2013. The actual reclassification to earnings will be based on mark to market prices at the contract settlement date, along with the realization of the gain or loss on the related physical volume, which is not reflected in the above table.
Derivatives Other Than Cash Flow Hedges
Assets and liabilities related to third party derivative contracts, swing swaps, basis swaps, storage swaps, processing margin swaps and liquids swaps are included in the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities and the profit and loss on the mark to market value of these contracts are recorded net as (gain) loss on derivatives in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. The Partnership estimates the fair value of all of its energy trading contracts using actively quoted prices. The estimated fair value of energy trading contracts by maturity date was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Maturity Periods |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Less than one year |
|
One to two years |
|
More than two years |
|
Total fair value |
| ||||
June 30, 2012 |
|
$ |
2,272 |
|
$ |
1,473 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,745 |
|
(7) Fair Value Measurements
FASB ASC 820 sets forth a framework for measuring fair value and required disclosures about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. Fair value under FASB ASC 820 is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liabilitys fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, use of unobservable prices or inputs are used to estimate the current fair value, often using an internal valuation model. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the item being valued.
FASB ASC 820 established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The Partnerships derivative contracts primarily consist of commodity swap contracts which are not traded on a public exchange. The fair values of commodity swap contracts are determined using discounted cash flow techniques. The techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs for future commodity prices that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. These market inputs are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instruments term, notional amount, discount rate and credit risk and are classified as Level 2 in hierarchy.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Net assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2012 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
| ||
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 2 |
| ||
Commodity Swaps* |
|
$ |
5,438 |
|
$ |
(2,720 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
5,438 |
|
$ |
(2,720 |
) |
* Unrealized gains or losses on commodity derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income at each measurement date. The fair value of derivative contracts included in assets or liabilities for risk management activities represents the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in a current arms-length transaction adjusted for credit risk of the Partnership and/or the counterparty as required under FASB ASC 820.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair value of the Partnerships financial instruments has been determined by the Partnership using available market information and valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to develop the estimates of fair value; thus, the estimates provided below are not necessarily indicative of the amount the Partnership could realize upon the sale or refinancing of such financial instruments (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2012 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
| ||||
|
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
| ||||
Fair value of 2022 Notes classified as current debt |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
$ |
246,720 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
762,357 |
|
$ |
816,500 |
|
$ |
798,409 |
|
$ |
882,500 |
|
Obligations under capital lease |
|
$ |
26,831 |
|
$ |
28,847 |
|
$ |
28,367 |
|
$ |
27,637 |
|
The carrying amounts of the Partnerships cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.
The Partnership had $48.0 million in borrowings under its revolving credit facility included in long-term debt as of June 30, 2012 and $85.0 million at December 31, 2011. As borrowings under the credit facility accrue interest under floating interest rate structures, the carrying value of such indebtedness approximates fair value for the amounts outstanding under the credit facility. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Partnership also had borrowings totaling $714.4 million and $713.4 million, net of discount, respectively, under the 2018 Notes with a fixed rate of 8.875% and $250.0 million as of June 30, 2012 under the 2022 Notes with a fixed rate of 7.125%. The fair value of all senior unsecured notes as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was based on Level 1 inputs from third-party market quotations. The fair value of obligations under capital leases was calculated using Level 2 inputs from third-party banks.
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(8) Commitments and Contingencies
(a) Employment and Severance Agreements
Certain members of management of the Partnership are parties to employment and/or severance agreements with the general partner. The employment and severance agreements provide those managers with severance payments in certain circumstances and, in the case of employment agreements, prohibit each such person from competing with the general partner or its affiliates for a certain period of time following the termination of such persons employment.
(b) Environmental Issues
The Partnership acquired LIG Pipeline Company and its subsidiaries on April 1, 2004. Contamination from historical operations was identified during due diligence at a number of sites owned by the acquired companies. The seller, AEP, has indemnified the Partnership for these identified sites. Moreover, AEP has entered into an agreement with a third party company pursuant to which the remediation costs associated with these sites have been assumed by this third party company that specializes in remediation work. The Partnership does not expect to incur any material liability with these sites; however, there can be no assurance that the third parties who have assumed responsibility for remediation of site conditions will fulfill their obligations.
(c) Other
The Partnership is involved in various litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, any liabilities that may result from these claims would not individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
On June 7, 2010, Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas, Formosa Plastics Corporation, America, Formosa Utility Venture, Ltd., and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America filed a lawsuit against Crosstex Energy, Inc., Crosstex Energy, L.P., Crosstex Energy GP, L.P., Crosstex Energy GP, LLC, Crosstex Energy Services, L.P., and Crosstex Gulf Coast Marketing, Ltd. in the 24th Judicial District Court of Calhoun County, Texas, asserting claims for negligence, res ipsa loquitor, products liability and strict liability relating to the alleged receipt by the plaintiffs of natural gas liquids into their facilities from facilities operated by the Partnership. The amended petition alleges that the plaintiffs have incurred at least $35.0 million in damages, including damage to equipment and lost profits. The Partnership has submitted the claim to its insurance carriers and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit. The Partnership believes that any recovery would be within applicable policy limits. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, the Partnership does not expect that an award in this matter will have a material adverse impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
At times, the Partnerships gas-utility and common carrier subsidiaries acquire pipeline easements and other property rights by exercising rights of eminent domain. As a result, the Partnership (or its subsidiaries) is a party to a number of lawsuits under which a court will determine the value of pipeline easements or other property interests obtained by the Partnerships gas utility subsidiaries by condemnation. Damage awards in these suits should reflect the value of the property interest acquired and the diminution in the value of the remaining property owned by the landowner. However, some landowners have alleged unique damage theories to inflate their damage claims or assert valuation methodologies that could result in damage awards in excess of the amounts anticipated. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes of these matters, the Partnership does not expect that awards in these matters will have a material adverse impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
The Partnership (or its subsidiaries) is defending lawsuits filed by owners of property located near processing facilities or compression facilities constructed by the Partnership as part of its systems. The suits generally allege that the facilities create a private nuisance and have damaged the value of surrounding property. Claims of this nature have arisen as a result of the industrial development of natural gas gathering, processing and treating facilities in urban and occupied rural areas. In January 2012, a plaintiff in one of these lawsuits was awarded a judgment of $2.0 million. The Partnership has appealed the matter and has posted a bond to secure the judgment pending its resolution. The Partnership has accrued $2.0 million related to this matter and reflected the related
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
expense in operating expenses in the fourth quarter of 2011. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes of these matters, the Partnership does not expect that awards in these matters will have a material adverse impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
(9) Segment Information
Identification of operating segments is based principally upon regions served. The Partnerships reportable segments consist of the natural gas gathering, processing and transmission operations located in north Texas and in the Permian Basin in west Texas (NTX), the pipelines and processing plants located in Louisiana (LIG) and the south Louisiana processing and NGL assets (PNGL). Operating activity for assets sold in the comparative periods that was not considered discontinued operations as well as intersegment eliminations is shown in the corporate segment.
The Partnership evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating revenues and segment profits. Corporate expenses include general partnership expenses associated with managing all reportable operating segments. Corporate assets consist primarily of property and equipment, including software, for general corporate support, working capital, debt financing costs, its investment in HEP, and as of June 30, 2012, $245.1 million in restricted cash. (See note 2 in these notes to condensed consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of the restricted cash.)
Summarized financial information concerning the Partnerships reportable segments is shown in the following table.
|
|
LIG |
|
NTX |
|
PNGL |
|
Corporate |
|
Totals |
| |||||
|