---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Item 1. Security and Issuer.

This Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13D (this “Amendment”) amends and supplements the Schedule 13D filed by the Reporting Persons on January 19, 2016 (the “Original Schedule 13D” and, as amended and supplemented by this Amendment, the “Schedule 13D”). Except as specifically provided herein, this Amendment does not modify any of the information previously reported on the Original Schedule 13D. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the same meanings ascribed thereto in the Original Schedule 13D.

Item 2. Identity and Background.

Item 2 of the Original Schedule 13D is hereby amended by replacing in their entirety Schedules I, II-A, II-B, II-C,and III, incorporated therein by reference with Schedules I, II-A, II-B, II-C, and III, hereto, respectively, which Schedules I, II-A, II-B, II-C, and III are incorporated herein by reference.

This Amendment amends and restates the second paragraph of Item 2 of the Original Schedule 13D in its entirety as set forth below.

“The GS Entities are the direct or indirect beneficial owners of WSIP and WSEP, which hold [100]¹ shares of common stock, and have appointed one of the two board members, of Enfield Holdings Advisors, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Enfield Holdings Advisors”). Enfield Holdings Advisors is the general partner of Enfield Holdings, which directly holds [54,312,781] Series B Preferred Units (which are convertible into Common Units of the Issuer on a one-for-one basis). Because of the relationship by and between the GS Entities, WSIP and WSEP on the one hand and Enfield Holdings on the other hand, the GS Entities, WSIP and WSEP may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the Common Units. The remaining shares of common stock of Enfield Holdings Advisors are held by, and the remaining director of Enfield Holdings Advisors is appointed by, affiliates of TPG Global, LLC (“TPG”, and together with the Reporting Persons, the “Sponsors”)”.

Item 4. Purpose of Transaction.

This Amendment amends and restates the eighth paragraph of Item 4 of the Original Schedule 13D in its entirety as set forth below.

“Amended and Restated Coordination Agreement

The Amended and Restated Coordination and Securityholders’ Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2017 (the “Coordination Agreement”), by and among Enfield Holdings, Enfield Holdings Advisors, WSEP, WSIP (together with WSEP, and each of their affiliates, the “GS Investors”), TPG VII Egypt Finance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“TPG VII Egypt Finance”) and TPG Advisors VII (together with TPG VII Egypt Finance and each of their affiliates, the “TPG Investors” and together with the GS Investors, the “Investors”) sets forth certain agreements, including with respect to governance, transfer restrictions, the purchase of additional securities, the exercise of rights under the Registration Rights Agreement and certain other matters.”

This Amendment amends and restates the tenth paragraph of Item 4 of the Original Schedule 13D in its entirety as set forth below.

“The Coordination Agreement generally restricts any transfers of any Partnership Securities, Series B Preferred Units, converted Common Units or common stock of Enfield Holdings Advisors (collectively, the “Securities”) by any Investor, except (i) transfers to an affiliate of that Investor, so long as that transferee remains an affiliate following the transfer and (ii) transfers pursuant to foreclosure by a lender on such Securities pursuant to any loan agreement to which such Investor is a party and such Securities are pledged as collateral.  If any Investor wishes to transfer any Securities to anyone else, that Investor is subject to the other Investors’ right of first offer (in the case of Partnership Securities, shares of common stock or Series B Preferred Units to address a regulatory concern) and tag-along rights. Enfield Holdings Advisors has a call right to acquire all of the shares of common stock of Enfield Holdings Advisors owned by any Investor and their affiliates who collectively cease to own 10% of the issued and outstanding Partnership Securities for the aggregate purchase price paid for such shares.”

---

---

 

Page 19 of 27 Pages

 

 

 

Broad Street Principal Investments, L.L.C.
By:	Goldman, Sachs & Co. its Manager
By:	/s/ Yvette Kosic
Name:	Yvette Kosic
Title:	Attorney in Fact
West Street Energy Partners Offshore – B AIV-1, L.P.
By:	Broad Street Energy Advisors AIV-1, L.L.C., its General Partner
By:	/s/ Yvette Kosic
Name:	Yvette Kosic
Title:	Attorney in Fact
West Street Energy Partners AIV-1, L.P.
By:	Broad Street Energy Advisors AIV-1, L.L.C., its General Partner
By:	/s/ Yvette Kosic
Name:	Yvette Kosic
Title:	Attorney in Fact
West Street Energy Partners Offshore AIV-1, L.P.
By:	Broad Street Energy Advisors AIV-1, L.L.C., its General Partner
By:	/s/ Yvette Kosic
Name:	Yvette Kosic
Title:	Attorney in Fact
West Street Energy Partners Offshore Holding – B AIV-1, L.P.
By:	Broad Street Energy Advisors AIV-1, L.L.C., its General Partner
By:	/s/ Yvette Kosic
Name:	Yvette Kosic
Title:	Attorney in Fact

WSIP Egypt Holdings, LP
By:	Broad Street Infrastructure Advisors III, L.L.C., its General Partner
By:	/s/ Yvette Kosic
Name:	Yvette Kosic
Title:	Attorney in Fact

 

Page 20 of 27 Pages

 

 

---

The name of each director of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is set forth below.

The business address of each person listed below is c/o Goldman, Sachs & Co., 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282.

Each person is a citizen of the United States of America except for Lakshmi N. Mittal, who is a citizen of India, Mark E. Tucker, who is a citizen of Great Britain, Mark O. Winkelman, who is a citizen of the Netherlands, and Adebayo O. Ogunlesi is also a citizen of Nigeria. The present principal occupation or employment of each of the listed persons is set forth below.

 

Name	Present Principal Occupation
Lloyd C. Blankfein	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
M. Michele Burns	Former Chairman and CEO, Mercer LLC; Former CFO of each of:  Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Mirant Corp. and Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Mark A. Flaherty	Former Vice Chairman, Wellington Management Company
William W. George	Senior Fellow at the Harvard Business School and Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Medtronic, Inc.
James A. Johnson	Chairman of Johnson Capital Partners
Ellen J. Kullman	Former Chair and Chief Executive Officer of DuPont
Lakshmi N. Mittal	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ArcelorMittal S.A.
Adebayo O. Ogunlesi	Chairman and Managing Partner of Global Infrastructure Partners
Peter Oppenheimer	Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Apple, Inc.
Debora L. Spar	Former President of Barnard College
Mark E. Tucker	Executive Director, Group Chief Executive and President of AIA Group Limited
David A. Viniar	Former Chief Financial Officer of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Mark O. Winkelman	Private Investor

---

 

---

 

---

---

The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)  has alleged that the huddles program of Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Goldman Sachs”) - a practice where Goldman Sachs equity research analysts allegedly provided their best trading ideas to Goldman Sachs traders and a select group of Goldman Sachs top clients - created a serious and substantial risk that analysts would share material nonpublic information concerning their published research with Asymmetric Service Initiative (“ASI”) clients and firm traders. The SEC alleged that Goldman Sachs willfully violated Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), by failing to establish, maintain, and enforce adequate policies and procedures to prevent such misuse in light of the risks arising from the huddles and ASI. Without admitting or denying such violations, Goldman Sachs consented to the entry of an Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order on April 12, 2012 (the “ASI Order”) by the SEC pursuant to which Goldman Sachs (i) shall cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act; (ii) is censured; (iii) paid a total civil money penalty of $22 million on April 19, 2012, $11 million of which was paid to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in a related proceeding, and $11 million of which was paid to the SEC, and (iv) shall comply with certain other undertakings, including a comprehensive review, including recommendations, of the policies, procedures and practices maintained and implemented by Goldman Sachs pursuant to Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act that relate to the findings of the ASI Order.

Starting in July 2008, Neil M.M. Morrison (“Morrison”) was employed by Goldman Sachs to solicit municipal underwriting business from, among others, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Treasurer’s Office. From November 2008 to October 2010, Morrison was also substantially engaged in the political campaigns, including the November 2010 Massachusetts gubernatorial campaign, for Timothy P. Cahill (“Cahill”), the then-Treasurer of Massachusetts. Morrison worked on Cahill’s campaign during work hours using firm resources. Morrison also made a secret, undisclosed cash campaign contribution to Cahill. Within two years of Morrison’s contribution, Goldman Sachs engaged in municipal securities business with issuers associated with Cahill as Treasurer and as a candidate for Governor. The SEC alleged that Goldman Sachs’s engagement in municipal securities business with these issuers violated Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act and MSRB Rule G-37(b), and that Goldman Sachs’s failure to maintain records of and to report in regulatory filings the contributions and campaign work, and to take steps to ensure that the attributed contributions, or campaign work or the conflicts of interest raised by them were disclosed in bond offering documents, violated MSRB Rules G-8, G-9, G-17, G-27 and G-37. Without admitting or denying such violations (except as to the SEC’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of the proceedings), Goldman Sachs consented to the entry of an Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 15(b), 15B(c)(2) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order on September 27, 2012 (the “Morrison Order”). Goldman Sachs agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act, MSRB Rule G-37(b), MSRB Rule G-17, MSRB Rule G-27, MSRB Rule G-37(e), MSRB Rule G-8 and MSRB Rule G-9. Goldman Sachs is censured and was required to pay disgorgement of $7,558,942 and prejudgment interest of $670,033. Of the $7,558,942 in disgorgement, $2,120,547 will be deemed satisfied by Goldman Sachs’s payment of $1,512,902 to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and $607,645 to the Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust in a related action by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The remaining $5,438,395 and prejudgment interest of $670,033 was required to be paid to the SEC for remittance to the United States Treasury. Finally, the Morrison Order required Goldman Sachs to pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $3,750,000 to the SEC, of which $1,875,000 will be transferred to the MSRB in accordance with Section 15B(c)(9)(A) of the Exchange Act, and of which the remaining $1,875,000 will be transferred to the United States Treasury. The disgorgement, prejudgment interest and civil money penalty were all paid in full by submission of a wire to the SEC on October 3, 2012, and by submission of checks to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust on October 4, 2012.

The SEC has alleged that Goldman Sachs conducted inadequate due diligence in certain offerings and, as a result, failed to form a reasonable basis for believing the truthfulness of certain material representations in official statements issued in connection with those offerings. This resulted in Goldman Sachs offering and selling municipal securities on the basis of materially misleading disclosure documents. The SEC alleged that Goldman Sachs willfully violated Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The violations discussed in the Order were self-reported by Goldman Sachs to the SEC pursuant to the Division of Enforcement’s Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation Initiative. Without admitting or denying the violations, Goldman Sachs consented to the entry of an Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act and Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order on June 18, 2015 by the SEC pursuant to which Goldman Sachs: (I) shall cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act; (II) paid a civil money penalty in the amount of $500,000 on June 25, 2015; and (III) shall comply with the undertakings enumerated in the Order, including retaining an independent consultant to conduct a review of Goldman Sachs’s policies and procedures as they relate to municipal securities underwriting due diligence and requires Goldman Sachs to adopt the independent consultant’s recommendations (unless the SEC finds a recommendation unduly burdensome, impractical, or inappropriate, in which case Goldman Sachs shall not be required to abide by, adopt, or implement that recommendation).

The SEC has found that Goldman Sachs did not have a system of risk management controls and supervisory procedures reasonably designed to manage the financial, regulatory, and other risks of market access in relation to its listed equity options business, which contributed to the entry of erroneous electronic options orders on multiple options exchanges on August 20, 2013. The SEC found that Goldman Sachs willfully violated Section 15(c)(3) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15c3-5 thereunder in relation to its controls and supervisory procedures addressing (I) the entry of orders that exceed appropriate pre-set credit or capital thresholds; (II) the entry of erroneous orders that exceed appropriate price or size parameters or that indicate duplicative orders; and (III) the management of software changes that impact order flow. Without admitting or denying the violations, Goldman Sachs consented to the entry of an Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Exchange Act, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order on June 30, 2015 by the SEC pursuant to which Goldman Sachs: (I) shall cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 15(c)(3) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15c3-5 thereunder; (II) is censured; and (III) paid a total civil money penalty of $7 million on June 30, 2015.

The SEC alleged that Goldman Sachs violated Regulation SHO under the Exchange Act by improperly relying on Goldman Sachs’s automated locate function in the order management system without having confirmed the availability of the securities to be located.  In addition, the SEC alleged that Firm employees did not provide sufficient and accurate information with respect to these locates in Goldman Sachs’s locate log, which must reflect the basis upon which Goldman Sachs provided the locates. The SEC alleged that Goldman Sachs willfully violated Rule 203(b)(1) of Regulation SHO and Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act.  Without admitting or denying the violations, Goldman Sachs consented to the entry by the SEC of an Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Exchange Act, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (Release No. 34-76899, Jan. 14, 2016).  Pursuant to the Order, Goldman Sachs must cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Rule 203(b)(1) of Regulation SHO, and any violations and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 203(b)(1)(iii) thereunder relating to short sale locate records.  Also pursuant to the Order, Goldman Sachs was censured and paid a civil money penalty in the amount of $15,000,000 on January 20, 2016.  The SEC stated that, in determining to accept the Goldman Sachs’s offer of settlement, it considered certain remedial acts taken by Goldman Sachs.